Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

adds tpu_quic field to RpcContactInfo #31310

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 22, 2023

Conversation

behzadnouri
Copy link
Contributor

Problem

New ContactInfo implemented in #29596
specifies sockets for QUIC protocols explicitly.
The commit adds tpu_quic field to RpcContactInfo in preparation of LegacyContactInfo => ContactInfo migration.

Summary of Changes

added tpu_quic field to RpcContactInfo.

New ContactInfo implemented in
solana-labs#29596
specifies sockets for QUIC protocols explicitly.
The commit adds tpu_quic field to RpcContactInfo in preparation of
LegacyContactInfo => ContactInfo migration.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 21, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #31310 (cde6c90) into master (74e02ad) will increase coverage by 0.0%.
The diff coverage is 87.5%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master   #31310   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage    81.5%    81.5%           
=======================================
  Files         733      733           
  Lines      207054   207064   +10     
=======================================
+ Hits       168894   168919   +25     
+ Misses      38160    38145   -15     

Copy link
Contributor

@t-nelson t-nelson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

:shipit:

@behzadnouri behzadnouri merged commit 33bde55 into solana-labs:master Apr 22, 2023
@behzadnouri behzadnouri deleted the rpc-contact-info branch April 24, 2023 12:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants