Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Refactor and use MINIMUM_STAKE_DELEGATION constant #22663
Refactor and use MINIMUM_STAKE_DELEGATION constant #22663
Changes from all commits
74ba897
7683a5e
c225718
d67fc2f
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The function is called
validate_delegated_amount
but usessaturating_sub
which won't throw an error if the balance is less than rent exempt reserve. Is it possible to usechecked_sub
instead of the saturating one and throw an error when the sub fails, or are there already stake accounts on chain which would fail in that case?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The current behavior is intentional. (1) In the case where an account's balance is below the rent exempt minimum, then it has zero delegate-able lamports. (2) Adding new errors and/or changing what conditions return errors will change the program's behavior, which would break consensus without a feature-gate.
(In an initial iteration of this PR I had checks within this function to error in these cases, but I learned that wouldn't be a good idea to add—for the above reasons.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, makes sense
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is very picky but you could write this as:
which to me more directly expresses the condition stated in the comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Noted. I think I'm going to leave the code as-is so that I don't have to run (and babysit) CI again. Let me know if that's not OK.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah that's totally okay
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i love this crisp and lucid explanation. :)