Implement fee schedule in cost calculation

[tao-stones]

Problem

fee schedule should be implemented in cost calculation.

Summary of Changes

• update const cost values with data collected by Build InfluxDB query to help set transaction costs #19627
• update cost calculation to closely proposed fee schedule Comprehensive fees proposal #16984

Fixes #

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #20314 (80fa77d) into master (258c3bc) will decrease coverage by 0.1%.
The diff coverage is 89.3%.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master   #20314     +/-   ##
=========================================
- Coverage    82.3%    82.2%   -0.2%     
=========================================
  Files         497      492      -5     
  Lines      136959   137286    +327     
=========================================
+ Hits       112854   112952     +98     
- Misses      24105    24334    +229     

[jackcmay]

Great stuff! We want to switch the fee calculation from just sigs to using these calculated tx costs.

What do you think about passing a (tx, cost) pair into the bank batches? The bank can then use a fee governor to calculate the final tx fee for each transaction?

We also need to make these fee calculations available for transaction simulation. Maybe we give banks a ref to the cost tracker?

We should also be incorporating the cost of the account data sizes. We could feed that information back to the cost tracker like we currently do for execution costs. If an account size is not in the cache we could keep a list of account size averages per program.

[tao-stones]

We also need to make these fee calculations available for transaction simulation. Maybe we give banks a ref to the cost tracker?

Yea, was thinking to actually move cost tracker into bank, working PR #20527

[tao-stones]

What do you think about passing a (tx, cost) pair into the bank batches? The bank can then use a fee governor to calculate the final tx fee for each transaction?

Yea, perhaps it can fit into bankless leader process: banking stage get tx cost from cost model, before it loads accounts to check balance, it can use fee governor to convert cost into fee; Is this what you are thinking?

[tao-stones]

We should also be incorporating the cost of the account data sizes. We could feed that information back to the cost tracker like we currently do for execution costs. If an account size is not in the cache we could keep a list of account size averages per program.

That would be great! want to create a ticket for it?

[jackcmay]

What do you think about passing a (tx, cost) pair into the bank batches? The bank can then use a fee governor to calculate the final tx fee for each transaction?

Yea, perhaps it can fit into bankless leader process: banking stage get tx cost from cost model, before it loads accounts to check balance, it can use fee governor to convert cost into fee; Is this what you are thinking?

banking stage is already calculating the cost of each tx in order to schedule, rather than re-calc again later just pass this info along

[tao-stones]

We should also be incorporating the cost of the account data sizes. We could feed that information back to the cost tracker like we currently do for execution costs. If an account size is not in the cache we could keep a list of account size averages per program.

That would be great! want to create a ticket for it?

#20511 , once the info is fed to cost model, I can update the calculation to incorporate it.