Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add test_bank_forks_incremental_snapshot() #18565
Add test_bank_forks_incremental_snapshot() #18565
Changes from 1 commit
87a7667
ba0f6dc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This flag to not check the hash was introduced here: https://github.com/solana-labs/solana/pull/17939/files#diff-b5dead0a38e5f63447595bbeda1428d3aa851d33954343bb1bc38b4b00add5fdR149, not sure why it's not safe to check the hash here.
Maybe the hash is verified elsewhere already? Would be good to check the accounts state is being verified to match the snapshot hash somewhere in the test.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
heh, looks like in the normal path, the hash is verified after the call to
bank_from_snapshot_archives()
solana/ledger/src/bank_forks_utils.rs
Lines 149 to 171 in 86bda02
Can we extract this piece of logic (the unpacking and the hash verify), into a separate function like
deserialize_and_verify_bank
and call that function from hereThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@carllin Sure thing. Can I break this out into a separate PR/issue instead of fixing inside this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If extracting the above logic into a function and calling it from the test works, I think it makes sense to include in this PR, as testing the accounts hash seems important to the snapshot tests.
If somethings broken/hash doesn't verify, then a separate PR makes sense to me.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Carl and I talked. I've created a new issue to track this request: #18973.