Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[do not merge] Jenkins #146

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

aeyakovenko
Copy link
Member

see if jenkins will build

@aeyakovenko
Copy link
Member Author

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@solana-jenkins
Copy link
Contributor

test

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Apr 24, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #146 into master will increase coverage by 0.13%.
The diff coverage is 97.84%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #146      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   96.39%   96.52%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          18       19       +1     
  Lines        1886     2072     +186     
==========================================
+ Hits         1818     2000     +182     
- Misses         68       72       +4
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/lib.rs 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️
src/crdt.rs 97.84% <97.84%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 041de80...65432ec. Read the comment docs.

@aeyakovenko aeyakovenko deleted the jenkins branch April 24, 2018 18:37
CriesofCarrots pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2020
mvines referenced this pull request in mvines/solana Jun 15, 2020
mvines pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 15, 2020
yhchiang-sol added a commit to yhchiang-sol/solana that referenced this pull request Mar 13, 2024
…-labs#218)

#### Problem
As we further optimize the HotStorageMeta in solana-labs#146, there is a need
for a HotAccount struct that contains all the hot account information.
Meanwhile, we currently don't have plans to develop a cold account
format at this moment.  As a result, this makes it desirable to repurpose
TieredReadableAccount to HotAccount.

#### Summary of Changes
Repurpose TieredReadableAccount to HotAccount.

#### Test Plan
Existing tiered-storage tests.
willhickey pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 16, 2024
#### Problem
As we further optimize the HotStorageMeta in #146, there is a need
for a HotAccount struct that contains all the hot account information.
Meanwhile, we currently don't have plans to develop a cold account
format at this moment.  As a result, this makes it desirable to repurpose
TieredReadableAccount to HotAccount.

#### Summary of Changes
Repurpose TieredReadableAccount to HotAccount.

#### Test Plan
Existing tiered-storage tests.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants