Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature - Strict ELF parser #605

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Lichtso
Copy link

@Lichtso Lichtso commented Oct 7, 2024

No description provided.

@Lichtso Lichtso force-pushed the feature/strict_elf_parser branch 16 times, most recently from 86b4242 to 8291209 Compare October 14, 2024 15:03
@Lichtso Lichtso force-pushed the feature/strict_elf_parser branch 3 times, most recently from 931e496 to 20f2e6a Compare October 16, 2024 08:30
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 92.59259% with 18 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.79%. Comparing base (1223789) to head (20f2e6a).
Report is 16 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/elf.rs 91.62% 17 Missing ⚠️
src/elf_parser/mod.rs 90.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #605      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.09%   89.79%   -0.31%     
==========================================
  Files          22       22              
  Lines        9726    10063     +337     
==========================================
+ Hits         8763     9036     +273     
- Misses        963     1027      +64     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@Lichtso Lichtso force-pushed the feature/strict_elf_parser branch 2 times, most recently from b8b1a69 to 5b1d9ec Compare October 17, 2024 15:18
@Lichtso Lichtso closed this Oct 22, 2024
@Lichtso Lichtso deleted the feature/strict_elf_parser branch October 22, 2024 13:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants