-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Missing exception warnings #12
Conversation
This looks fine to me. Please squash. |
I still need to move some rules to |
This will wait for some time, until I move some helper code related to |
14: Warn for raise with three compnents r=ltratt a=nanjekyejoannah This makes sense at the AST hence isolated from the [other exception PR](#12) Co-authored-by: Joannah Nanjekye <[email protected]>
@nanjekyejoannah Is this one ready for merging now? |
I have one more PR on my list of 68 things before we come back here. I can certainly get like 4 exception warnings merged as part of this PR and leave what what is making this PR wait, but I prefer to wait to handle all exceptions with the helpers in ceval. I will do that next after these open PRs are merged, just the dict PR, then this is next thing after. |
If you're happy to wait, I'm fine with that! |
Where are we with this one? |
I think lets merge this, I am delayng it because of scope. I will commit the scope PR as a separate topic with other things that involve scope e.g exec, etc. I will handle scope as one topic for all things on my list, Some exception warnings, I already separated before, like the 3 component PR. |
Please squash. |
59237fa
to
7e96d87
Compare
Squashed. |
bors r+ |
12: Missing exception warnings r=ltratt a=nanjekyejoannah Dont review until [this](#12) is merged. Co-authored-by: Joannah Nanjekye <[email protected]>
Build failed: |
Dont review until this is merged.