Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Scan Docker images in Snyk Github action #1191

Closed
lmath opened this issue Feb 14, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed

Scan Docker images in Snyk Github action #1191

lmath opened this issue Feb 14, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@lmath
Copy link
Contributor

lmath commented Feb 14, 2023

Let's use snyk container monitor because we want to

  • be able to keep track of vulnerabilities in the docker images we create on release without manually
    adding them in the Snyk UI
  • continue scanning our java/scala jar files (by providing param --app-vulns)
lmath added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2023
We are moving over to using `snyk container monitor` because we want to
- be able to keep track of vulnerabilities in the docker images we create on release without manually
adding them in the Snyk UI
- continue scanning our java/scala jar files
lmath added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 14, 2023
We are moving over to using `snyk container monitor` because we want to
- be able to keep track of vulnerabilities in the docker images we create on release without manually
adding them in the Snyk UI
- continue scanning our java/scala jar files
lmath added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 15, 2023
We are moving over to using `snyk container monitor` because we want to
- be able to keep track of vulnerabilities in the docker images we create on release without manually
adding them in the Snyk UI
- continue scanning our java/scala jar files
lmath added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2023
Whenever we release RDB loader, we run a Snyk scan to check for security vulnerabilites.

Previously, we had a separate Github action for this, `snyk.yml` which just ran `snyk monitor` and
did not scan the docker images.

We are moving over to using `snyk container monitor` because we want to
- be able to keep track of vulnerabilities in the docker images we create on release without manually
adding them in the Snyk UI
- continue scanning our java/scala jar files

Note that even though we are already creating docker images in `ci.yml`, they are pushed to the remote
registry only, and that is why here we additionally add a step to create local Docker images for the
Snyk scan.
istreeter pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2023
Whenever we release RDB loader, we run a Snyk scan to check for security vulnerabilites.

Previously, we had a separate Github action for this, `snyk.yml` which just ran `snyk monitor` and
did not scan the docker images.

We are moving over to using `snyk container monitor` because we want to
- be able to keep track of vulnerabilities in the docker images we create on release without manually
adding them in the Snyk UI
- continue scanning our java/scala jar files

Note that even though we are already creating docker images in `ci.yml`, they are pushed to the remote
registry only, and that is why here we additionally add a step to create local Docker images for the
Snyk scan.
istreeter pushed a commit that referenced this issue Mar 7, 2023
Whenever we release RDB loader, we run a Snyk scan to check for security vulnerabilites.

Previously, we had a separate Github action for this, `snyk.yml` which just ran `snyk monitor` and
did not scan the docker images.

We are moving over to using `snyk container monitor` because we want to
- be able to keep track of vulnerabilities in the docker images we create on release without manually
adding them in the Snyk UI
- continue scanning our java/scala jar files

Note that even though we are already creating docker images in `ci.yml`, they are pushed to the remote
registry only, and that is why here we additionally add a step to create local Docker images for the
Snyk scan.
@pondzix pondzix closed this as completed in bcb9ada Mar 8, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant