You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Right now the peaks reads scale between [1-2] this could be changed to [0-1] to allow for a broader separation between reads with highly different areas. As there are not very often datasets with Fasta/simple and peaks data at once the old argument of the peaks reads needing to have a higher score than the other reads does not really hold.
Besides this it is also interesting to think a bit better on how to normalize the scores. Now the score is absolute but there can be made some points that a normalized scoring (the best is always 1) is beneficial. Although it then has to be seen if this does not introduce too big of a problem when changing the cutoff scores in the batchfile.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now the peaks reads scale between [1-2] this could be changed to [0-1] to allow for a broader separation between reads with highly different areas. As there are not very often datasets with Fasta/simple and peaks data at once the old argument of the peaks reads needing to have a higher score than the other reads does not really hold.
Besides this it is also interesting to think a bit better on how to normalize the scores. Now the score is absolute but there can be made some points that a normalized scoring (the best is always 1) is beneficial. Although it then has to be seen if this does not introduce too big of a problem when changing the cutoff scores in the batchfile.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: