Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix name of XML root nodes in tests #2423

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2024
Merged

Fix name of XML root nodes in tests #2423

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 16, 2024

Conversation

kstich
Copy link
Contributor

@kstich kstich commented Oct 16, 2024

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@kstich kstich requested a review from a team as a code owner October 16, 2024 20:12
@kstich kstich merged commit b2f4752 into main Oct 16, 2024
14 checks passed
@kstich kstich deleted the fix_xml_test_root_nodes branch October 16, 2024 20:30
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit to smithy-lang/smithy-rs that referenced this pull request Oct 24, 2024
## Motivation and Context
<!--- Why is this change required? What problem does it solve? -->
<!--- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here -->
Bumping smithy to 1.52 for an `httpChecksum` trait bugfix

A few fixes had to be made to protocol tests for this release:
* Update document to initialize as empty `{}` instead of null
* Update our header serialization to serialize present but empty headers
to `""` (Note that this change does not apply to server header
serialization)
* Add `accept: application/cbor` header to add rpcV2Cbor requests
* Skip two broken tests. These tests were fixed in
smithy-lang/smithy#2423 and that change was
included in the 1.52 release notes, but the actual change did not make
it into the build artifact. The changes should make it into the 1.52.1
release in the next few days:
smithy-lang/smithy#2428

_By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify,
copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your
choice._
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants