Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add protocol specific routers #1666
Add protocol specific routers #1666
Changes from 2 commits
1d8cb1f
a1f2e3e
17ad96a
81b4791
1f50577
f76bb0e
5eddefa
242f609
1ec5578
1f3aba8
2f9a02f
7256575
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add
#[doc(hidden)]
? Since only codegen needs to be aware of this trait.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There's already a
#[doc(hidden)]
at the module level inlib.rs
. TheResponse
above is double hidden, which threw me off too - should I remove that?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah, missed that. Thought it wasn't because
Response
was doc hidden.Ok then, no need to double hide
Response
--- although, I'm thinking that middleware authors will need access to it right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that third-parties might want to see
IntoResponse
andFromRequest
eventually? They'll need it to implement their own protocols etc. I was thinking of keeping them hidden until everything in the RFC has been implemented. I'm not 100% sure on whetherIntoResponse
needs a second parameterization over the operation, which would be a breaking change.I don't mind (double?) unhiding
Response
, no strong feelings about that.