Separate RuntimeError into protocol specific errors #1703
Assignees
Labels
server
Rust server SDK
Comments
Merged
|
Progress towards this, removing the runtime |
david-perez
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 30, 2023
As outlined in the [Protocol Specific Errors] of the [Service Builder Improvements RFC], `RuntimeError` should be split up into smaller, protocol specific, errors which accurately model the failure cases of each protocol. The same goes for `RequestRejection`. Closes #1703. [Protocol Specific Errors]: https://github.com/awslabs/smithy-rs/blob/main/design/src/rfcs/rfc0020_service_builder.md#protocol-specific-errors [Service Builder Improvements RFC]: https://github.com/awslabs/smithy-rs/blob/main/design/src/rfcs/rfc0020_service_builder.md
david-perez
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 30, 2023
As outlined in the [Protocol Specific Errors] of the [Service Builder Improvements RFC], `RuntimeError` should be split up into smaller, protocol specific, errors which accurately model the failure cases of each protocol. The same goes for `RequestRejection`. Closes #1703. [Protocol Specific Errors]: https://github.com/awslabs/smithy-rs/blob/main/design/src/rfcs/rfc0020_service_builder.md#protocol-specific-errors [Service Builder Improvements RFC]: https://github.com/awslabs/smithy-rs/blob/main/design/src/rfcs/rfc0020_service_builder.md
david-perez
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 3, 2023
As outlined in the [Protocol Specific Errors] of the [Service Builder Improvements RFC], `RuntimeError` should be split up into smaller, protocol specific, errors which accurately model the failure cases of each protocol. The same goes for `RequestRejection`. Closes #1703. [Protocol Specific Errors]: https://github.com/awslabs/smithy-rs/blob/main/design/src/rfcs/rfc0020_service_builder.md#protocol-specific-errors [Service Builder Improvements RFC]: https://github.com/awslabs/smithy-rs/blob/main/design/src/rfcs/rfc0020_service_builder.md
unexge
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 24, 2023
As outlined in the [Protocol Specific Errors] of the [Service Builder Improvements RFC], `RuntimeError` should be split up into smaller, protocol specific, errors which accurately model the failure cases of each protocol. The same goes for `RequestRejection`. Closes #1703. [Protocol Specific Errors]: https://github.com/awslabs/smithy-rs/blob/main/design/src/rfcs/rfc0020_service_builder.md#protocol-specific-errors [Service Builder Improvements RFC]: https://github.com/awslabs/smithy-rs/blob/main/design/src/rfcs/rfc0020_service_builder.md
rcoh
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 24, 2023
As outlined in the [Protocol Specific Errors] of the [Service Builder Improvements RFC], `RuntimeError` should be split up into smaller, protocol specific, errors which accurately model the failure cases of each protocol. The same goes for `RequestRejection`. Closes #1703. [Protocol Specific Errors]: https://github.com/awslabs/smithy-rs/blob/main/design/src/rfcs/rfc0020_service_builder.md#protocol-specific-errors [Service Builder Improvements RFC]: https://github.com/awslabs/smithy-rs/blob/main/design/src/rfcs/rfc0020_service_builder.md
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
As outlined in the Protocol Specific Errors of the Service Builder Improvements RFC,
RuntimeErrorshould be split up into smaller, protocol specific, errors which accurately model the failure cases of each protocol.In #1693 we have used a blanket implementation
which allows us to continue using
RuntimeErrorfor the moment being.As
RuntimeErroris behind a#[doc(hidden)]our policy allows us to remove it without classifying it as a breaking change.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: