Adds status to study tables

[dogversioning]

• Adds encounter status to study setup tables
• cuts over to encounter display for some counts
• renames nlp table to be explicit about contents and not collide with reserved namespace

Checklist

• Consider if documentation (like in docs/) needs to be updated
• Consider if tests should be added
• Run pylint if you're making changes beyond adding studies

[mikix]

thinking nit: I'm not opposed to our strategy here. And I assume you already thought about this, but just to get my hand on the ball too - is this a signal that we are being too strict? If we don't think so but still expect someone to run into this issue, then maybe it's a signal to double-confirm that our error message about using reserved words is clear and helpful.

[dogversioning]

I don't think so - here's my thought:

• This predates reserved words, so, I think this is sort of to be expected
• If you created a new table now, the error message you got would be explicit about why the table creation was rejected
• I think this table name is too generic, especially now that we're talking about potentially revisiting in the future with other nlp/llm technologies. I think it's better to be explicit about what kind of NLP tasks you did to get the results you got.