-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Separate CDI Layer from Implementation #271
Milestone
Comments
radcortez
added a commit
to radcortez/smallrye-config
that referenced
this issue
Mar 31, 2020
radcortez
added a commit
to radcortez/smallrye-config
that referenced
this issue
Mar 31, 2020
radcortez
added a commit
to radcortez/smallrye-config
that referenced
this issue
Jun 15, 2020
radcortez
added a commit
to radcortez/smallrye-config
that referenced
this issue
Jun 15, 2020
radcortez
added a commit
to radcortez/smallrye-config
that referenced
this issue
Jun 16, 2020
radcortez
added a commit
to radcortez/smallrye-config
that referenced
this issue
Jun 17, 2020
radcortez
added a commit
to radcortez/smallrye-config
that referenced
this issue
Jun 23, 2020
radcortez
added a commit
to radcortez/smallrye-config
that referenced
this issue
Jul 1, 2020
radcortez
added a commit
to radcortez/smallrye-config
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2020
radcortez
added a commit
to radcortez/smallrye-config
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2020
radcortez
added a commit
to radcortez/smallrye-config
that referenced
this issue
Jul 17, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
An initial thought is that the CDI layer would retain the current artifact name, so as not to break any downstream consumers, and then the pure Java implementation would be in a new artifact named {currentName]-core
The CDI artifact would then depend on the "-core" artifact for the bulk of the implementation and only contain the CDI specific pieces.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: