Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve code format consistency in docs #356

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jan 3, 2020

Conversation

seratch
Copy link
Member

@seratch seratch commented Dec 23, 2019

Summary

This pull request improves code format consistency in documentation and README. I used Visual Studio Code with the following settings.json:

{
  "editor.tabSize": 2,
  "editor.detectIndentation": false
}

Requirements (place an x in each [ ])

@seratch seratch added the docs M-T: Documentation work only label Dec 23, 2019
@seratch seratch self-assigned this Dec 23, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #356 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #356   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage      73%    73%           
=====================================
  Files           7      7           
  Lines         500    500           
  Branches      146    146           
=====================================
  Hits          365    365           
  Misses        103    103           
  Partials       32     32

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e3a5d34...c0b00fd. Read the comment docs.

@seratch seratch merged commit 9ff92ed into slackapi:master Jan 3, 2020
@seratch seratch deleted the code-format-consistency branch January 3, 2020 03:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs M-T: Documentation work only
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants