Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Node.js to v23.4.0 #555

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024
Merged

Update Node.js to v23.4.0 #555

merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 10, 2024

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
node final minor 23.3.0-alpine3.20 -> 23.4.0-alpine3.20

Release Notes

nodejs/node (node)

v23.4.0: 2024-12-10, Version 23.4.0 (Current), @​aduh95 prepared by @​targos

Compare Source

Notable Changes
Introducing experimental assert.partialDeepStrictEqual

Sometimes, when writing test, we want to validate that some specific properties
are present, and the mere presence of additional keys are not exactly relevant
for that specific test. For this use case, we can now use
assert.partialDeepStrictEqual, which should be familiar to those already using
assert.deepStrictEqual, with the main difference that it does not require all
properties in the actual parameter to be present in the expected parameter.

Here are a few examples of usage:

assert.partialDeepStrictEqual(
  { a: 1, b: 2, c: 3 },
  { a: 1, b: 2 },
);

assert.partialDeepStrictEqual(
  [1, 2, 3, 4],
  [2, 3],
);

assert.partialDeepStrictEqual(
  { a: { b: { c: 1, d: 2 } }, e: 3 },
  { a: { b: { c: 1 } } },
);

assert.partialDeepStrictEqual(
  { a: { b: { c: 1, d: 2 } }, e: 3 },
  { a: { b: { c: 1 } } },
);

assert.partialDeepStrictEqual(
  new Set([{ a: 1 }, { b: 1 }]),
  new Set([{ a: 1 }]),
);

assert.partialDeepStrictEqual(
  { a: new Set([{ a: 1 }, { b: 1 }]), b: new Map(), c: [1, 2, 3] },
  { a: new Set([{ a: 1 }]), c: [2] },
);

Contributed by Giovanni Bucci in #​54630.

Implement --trace-env and --trace-env-[js|native]-stack

This release introduces --trace-env, --trace-env-js-stack and --trace-env-native-stack
CLI options that print information about any access to environment variables done in the current
Node.js instance to stderr. Currently in the logs, only the names of the environment variables
being accessed are printed, while the values are not printed to avoid leaking sensitive
information. To print the stack trace of the access, use --trace-env-js-stack and/or
--trace-env-native-stack.

Contributed by Joyee Cheung in #​55604.

Other notable changes
Commits

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (ee32671) to head (63aab58).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              main      #555    +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%            
==========================================
  Files          108       108            
  Lines         4190      4190            
  Branches       500       706   +206     
==========================================
  Hits          4190      4190            

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sir-gon sir-gon merged commit 9f87175 into main Dec 11, 2024
34 checks passed
@renovate renovate bot deleted the renovate/node-23.x branch December 11, 2024 03:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant