Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use core 2.22.0, TileDB-Py 0.28.0, TileDB-R 0.26.0 on main branch #2448

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 16, 2024

Conversation

johnkerl
Copy link
Member

@johnkerl johnkerl commented Apr 16, 2024

Issue and/or context: Following our established procedure

Changes:

Notes for Reviewer: This PR is not ready for review. First I will look for green CI.

@johnkerl johnkerl changed the title Use core 2.22.0, TileDB-Py 0.28.0, TileDB-R 0.26.0 [WIP] Use core 2.22.0, TileDB-Py 0.28.0, TileDB-R 0.26.0 Apr 16, 2024
@johnkerl
Copy link
Member Author

[sc-44519]

@johnkerl johnkerl marked this pull request as ready for review April 16, 2024 19:20
@johnkerl johnkerl changed the title Use core 2.22.0, TileDB-Py 0.28.0, TileDB-R 0.26.0 Use core 2.22.0, TileDB-Py 0.28.0, TileDB-R 0.26.0 on main branch Apr 16, 2024
@johnkerl johnkerl merged commit ef38706 into main Apr 16, 2024
29 checks passed
@johnkerl johnkerl deleted the kerl/2.22.0 branch April 16, 2024 19:28
@@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ Imports:
Matrix,
stats,
bit64,
tiledb (>= 0.25.0),
tiledb (>= 0.26.0),
Copy link
Contributor

@eddelbuettel eddelbuettel Apr 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It may make sense to put more than one inequality here as we know that a future (higher) tiledb (R) package may bring an unsuitable (newer) TileDB Embedded version.

Copy link
Member Author

@johnkerl johnkerl Apr 16, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@eddelbuettel thanks! For now -- on main -- there is no higher version -- 0.26.0 just came into existence this week. And for "beyond that" we do indeed have a WIP going here #2374 and once that WIP is fully fleshed out and proceduralized, watch for further changes upcoming. There will be more changes coming today/tomorrow, and after that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants