You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current read methods (X(), etc) on ExperimentAxisQuery do not accept the common read() arguments which control ordering, etc. This reduces their utility when the user wants (for example) query results on X array to be returned in row-order.
Asks for ExperimentAxisQuery.X, .var and .obs: add at least add result_order and batch_size arguments, but ideally also partitions and platform_config
This is a low-effort change that would greatly increase the query utility.
The current read methods (
X()
, etc) onExperimentAxisQuery
do not accept the commonread()
arguments which control ordering, etc. This reduces their utility when the user wants (for example) query results on X array to be returned in row-order.Asks for ExperimentAxisQuery.X, .var and .obs: add at least add
result_order
andbatch_size
arguments, but ideally alsopartitions
andplatform_config
This is a low-effort change that would greatly increase the query utility.
Edit by @pablo-gar
result_order
andbatch_size
result_order
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: