Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip containers that are not found while checking container.items #478

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jun 5, 2017

Conversation

stefanoborini
Copy link
Contributor

@stefanoborini stefanoborini commented May 31, 2017

The current webapi checks the accounting and fetches containers for the accounting data, but there was nothing to prevent operating on containers not active.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented May 31, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #478 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #478      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.33%   95.34%   +<.01%     
==========================================
  Files          88       88              
  Lines        4077     4085       +8     
  Branches      259      260       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         3887     3895       +8     
  Misses        138      138              
  Partials       52       52
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
remoteappmanager/webapi/container.py 83.58% <100%> (+0.24%) ⬆️
remoteappmanager/webapi/tests/test_container.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cff1154...ec8f7fe. Read the comment docs.

@stefanoborini stefanoborini merged commit 75bfb77 into master Jun 5, 2017
@stefanoborini stefanoborini deleted the skip-missing-containers branch June 5, 2017 13:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants