Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade jupyterhub to 0.7.2 #355

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 7, 2017
Merged

Upgrade jupyterhub to 0.7.2 #355

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 7, 2017

Conversation

stefanoborini
Copy link
Contributor

Fixes #354

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #355 into master will increase coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #355      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.17%   95.21%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          92       92              
  Lines        3873     3891      +18     
  Branches      250      254       +4     
==========================================
+ Hits         3686     3705      +19     
  Misses        127      127              
+ Partials       60       59       -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
remoteappmanager/utils.py 86.53% <100%> (+2.44%)
remoteappmanager/command_line_config.py 100% <100%> (+4%)
remoteappmanager/jupyterhub/tests/test_spawners.py 92.39% <100%> (ø)
remoteappmanager/tests/utils.py 92.53% <100%> (+0.11%)
remoteappmanager/tests/test_command_line_config.py 100% <100%> (ø)
remoteappmanager/tests/test_utils.py 100% <100%> (ø)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c4e453f...6204842. Read the comment docs.

@stefanoborini stefanoborini merged commit b7a6a99 into master Mar 7, 2017
@stefanoborini stefanoborini deleted the upgrade-jupyterhub branch March 7, 2017 15:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants