Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Merged by Bors] - Remove audit ignore ws server #2051

Closed

Conversation

realbigsean
Copy link
Member

Issue Addressed

Closes #1669

Proposed Changes

Remove cargo audit ignore for ws server related vuln now that the ws server has been removed

Additional Info

N/A

@realbigsean realbigsean added low-hanging-fruit Easy to resolve, get it before someone else does! ready-for-review The code is ready for review labels Dec 4, 2020
Copy link
Member

@paulhauner paulhauner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice! The test failure looks like the non-deterministic one that we've seen recently, not a fault of this PR.

bors r+

@paulhauner paulhauner added ready-for-merge This PR is ready to merge. and removed ready-for-review The code is ready for review labels Dec 6, 2020
bors bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 6, 2020
## Issue Addressed

Closes #1669

## Proposed Changes

Remove cargo audit ignore for ws server related vuln now that the ws server has been removed

## Additional Info

N/A


Co-authored-by: realbigsean <[email protected]>
@bors bors bot changed the title Remove audit ignore ws server [Merged by Bors] - Remove audit ignore ws server Dec 7, 2020
@bors bors bot closed this Dec 7, 2020
@realbigsean realbigsean deleted the remove-audit-ignore-ws-server branch November 21, 2023 16:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
low-hanging-fruit Easy to resolve, get it before someone else does! ready-for-merge This PR is ready to merge.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants