Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: enable CIS testing in conformance runs #957

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 7, 2019

Conversation

rsmitty
Copy link
Member

@rsmitty rsmitty commented Aug 7, 2019

This PR will run through the kube-bench tests as part of our nightly
conformance runs

Signed-off-by: Spencer Smith [email protected]

@rsmitty rsmitty force-pushed the cis-e2e branch 7 times, most recently from 93301c5 to a9b8da7 Compare August 7, 2019 20:41
@rsmitty rsmitty changed the title [wip] chore: enable CIS testing in conformance runs chore: enable CIS testing in conformance runs Aug 7, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Aug 7, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #957 into master will increase coverage by 0.03%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #957      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   35.42%   35.45%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         119      119              
  Lines        5934     5934              
==========================================
+ Hits         2102     2104       +2     
+ Misses       3637     3636       -1     
+ Partials      195      194       -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
internal/app/machined/pkg/system/service_runner.go 92.48% <0%> (+0.93%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 902577b...6e83f09. Read the comment docs.

This PR will run through the kube-bench tests as part of our nightly
conformance runs

Signed-off-by: Spencer Smith <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants