You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Would jabba be a good place to add support for JVM builds with Shenandoah?
Binary builds are provided by the build farm. The build numbers change daily, and only seven of the last ones are available to download. I would imagine the auto-discovery for index.json will have to be changed to support this.
I am willing to help out if you think this is a good idea.
P.S. I am a maintainer of JDK8 Shenandoah build for ArchLinux. Always changing build numbers make it tedious keeping the PKGBUILD definition up to date. I think having support for jabba would be a better approach.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Would jabba be a good place to add support for JVM builds with Shenandoah?
Binary builds are provided by the build farm. The build numbers change daily, and only seven of the last ones are available to download. I would imagine the auto-discovery for
index.json
will have to be changed to support this.I am willing to help out if you think this is a good idea.
P.S. I am a maintainer of JDK8 Shenandoah build for ArchLinux. Always changing build numbers make it tedious keeping the PKGBUILD definition up to date. I think having support for jabba would be a better approach.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: