Be more explicit about detecting fs.readdirSync support. #56
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Tools like Browserify result in a require('fs') that returns something not falsey.
|
+1 |
|
Why not just if (fs && fs.readdirSync)? |
|
+1 |
|
+1 from my side as I ran into the same problem an these changes fixes it for me. |
|
fixed in eae5f0e |
This was referenced Jan 23, 2021
1 task
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Tools like Browserify result in a
require('fs')that returns something not falsey, so this more explicit checking prevents thefs.readdirSynccall from being attempted unless the function itself exists.