Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add test for isBinary #63

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024
Merged

add test for isBinary #63

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

shogo82148
Copy link
Owner

@shogo82148 shogo82148 commented Feb 2, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Added a new test for checking binary content identification.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 2, 2024

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@shogo82148 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 24 minutes and 51 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 67240ae and 7d323f4.

Walkthrough

This update introduces a new test function, TestIsBinary, aimed at rigorously evaluating the isBinary function. This addition is designed to ensure that the function accurately identifies various content types, distinguishing between binary and non-binary data through a series of expected boolean outcomes. This enhancement not only bolsters the robustness of the testing suite but also reinforces the reliability of content type detection within the application.

Changes

File Summary
ridgenative_test.go Added TestIsBinary to test isBinary function with various content types.

🐇✨
In the code's woven burrow, deep,
A test was born, from digital sleep.
To ask, in bytes, both false and true,
"Are you binary, through and through?"
🌟🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2b11e0b and 67240ae.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • ridgenative_test.go (1 hunks)

Comment on lines 953 to 976
func TestIsBinary(t *testing.T) {
tests := []struct {
contentType string
want bool
}{
{"text/html", false},
{"text/plain", false},
{"text/xml", false},
{"application/json", false},
{"application/javascript", false},
{"application/xml", false},
{"application/foo+json", false},
{"application/foo+xml", false},
{"application/foo+xml ; charset=utf8", false},
{"application/octet-stream", true},
}

for _, tt := range tests {
got := isBinary(tt.contentType)
if got != tt.want {
t.Errorf("isBinary(%q) = %v, want %v", tt.contentType, got, tt.want)
}
}
}
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Feb 2, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The test function TestIsBinary is well-structured and covers a good range of content types to verify the isBinary function's behavior. However, it's recommended to also include edge cases and content types that are commonly mistaken for binary or non-binary to ensure comprehensive coverage. For example, adding content types like image/jpeg, audio/mpeg, or even a case with an empty string could provide more insight into the function's robustness.

Consider adding more test cases to cover:

  • Common binary content types (e.g., image/jpeg, audio/mpeg).
  • Edge cases such as an empty string or unusual content types.
  • Content types with parameters other than charset, to ensure parsing is handled correctly.

This will enhance the test's ability to catch potential issues in the isBinary function.

Copy link
Owner Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks, I added more test cases: 7d323f4

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@shogo82148, I've reviewed the latest changes to the TestIsBinary function, and it looks like you've successfully added the suggested test cases, including common binary content types (image/jpeg, audio/mpeg), an edge case with an empty string, and a case for an unknown content type. These additions should significantly enhance the test coverage and robustness of the isBinary function. Great work!


🐰

Analysis chain
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Fetch the latest changes from the pull request branch
git fetch origin pull/63/head:pr-63
git checkout pr-63
# Locate and display the modifications to the TestIsBinary function within ridgenative_test.go
git diff HEAD~1 -- ridgenative_test.go

Length of output: 672

@shogo82148 shogo82148 merged commit 6dfa91f into main Feb 2, 2024
21 checks passed
@shogo82148 shogo82148 deleted the add-test-for-is-binary branch February 2, 2024 07:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant