Fix: Playwright e2e helpers - Response body handling #168
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Server
Client->>Server: Request data
Server-->>Client: response.body
Note right of Server: Old method
Client->>Server: Request data
Server-->>Client: response.json()
Note right of Server: New method
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
lib/generators/cypress_on_rails/templates/spec/playwright/support/on-rails.js (2)
34-34: LGTM! Consider adding type documentationThe change to
response.json()completes the consistent response handling across all VCR-related functions. Since these functions are part of a testing framework, it might be helpful to add JSDoc comments describing the expected response structure.Example documentation:
/** * Ejects the current VCR cassette * @returns {Promise<Object>} The JSON response from the VCR eject operation */
Line range hint
11-34: Consider documenting the response handling change in CHANGELOGThe switch from
response.bodytoresponse.json()across all helper functions is a good architectural improvement that provides better developer experience. However, this could be a breaking change if any consumers were directly working with the Buffer response.Suggestions:
- Add a CHANGELOG entry documenting this change
- Consider bumping the major version if this is a public API
- Update the README to highlight the JSON response handling
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
lib/generators/cypress_on_rails/templates/spec/playwright/support/on-rails.js(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
lib/generators/cypress_on_rails/templates/spec/playwright/support/on-rails.js (2)
26-26: LGTM! Consistent response handling
The change to response.json() maintains consistency with the response handling pattern and properly handles VCR cassette insertion responses.
11-11: LGTM! Improved response handling
The change to response.json() is correct and provides better handling of JSON responses. Since this is a core helper function used by other utilities, we should verify that all consumers handle the parsed JSON correctly.
✅ Verification successful
Change to response.json() is safe and properly handled by consumers
The verification confirms that:
- In Playwright: The response is used as JSON with
body[0]access pattern - In Cypress: The response is already handled as JSON through
cy.request() - In example usage: Data is accessed as JSON array/objects
- No Buffer/string operations found in any consumers
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all consumers of appCommands expect JSON data
# Look for any direct usage of appCommands where the response might be treated as a Buffer/string
# Search for direct appCommands usage
rg -l "appCommands\(" --type js
# Search for potential Buffer operations on the response
rg -l "toString\(\)|Buffer\." --type js
Length of output: 314
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine how appCommands is used in the found files
# First, check the implementation in the Playwright support file
rg -A 10 "appCommands" "lib/generators/cypress_on_rails/templates/spec/playwright/support/on-rails.js"
# Then check the Cypress support file for comparison
rg -A 10 "appCommands" "lib/generators/cypress_on_rails/templates/spec/cypress/support/on-rails.js"
# Finally, check the example usage
rg -A 10 "appCommands" "lib/generators/cypress_on_rails/templates/spec/cypress/e2e/rails_examples/other.cy.js"
Length of output: 2349
|
@MUTOgen @grantspeelman can you take a look? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@helio3197 Could you check CI?
I think this fix should help here
cypress-on-rails/specs_e2e/rails_4_2/Gemfile
Lines 6 to 8 in bacf5c5
| @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ const appCommands = async (data) => { | |||
| const response = await context.post('/__e2e__/command', { data }) | |||
|
|
|||
| expect(response.ok()).toBeTruthy() | |||
| return response.body | |||
| return response.json(); | |||
| } | |||
|
|
|||
| const app = (name, options = {}) => appCommands({ name, options }).then((body) => body[0]) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@helio3197 Since appCommand now returns JSON, don't you think then part for app should be updated as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it should remain the same since the /__e2e__/command endpoint returns an array of command execution results, and the current behavior is to grab the first command result as the return value as app handles only a command request at time
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
specs_e2e/rails_4_2/Gemfile (1)
4-4: Consider upgrading the test environment.This test environment is using Rails 4.2, which has reached end-of-life in 2019. While this fix works, consider creating a plan to upgrade the test environment to a supported Rails version to ensure security and compatibility with modern dependencies.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
specs_e2e/rails_4_2/Gemfile(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
specs_e2e/rails_4_2/Gemfile (1)
6-8: Well-documented gem addition!
The addition of the bigdecimal gem is properly documented with a clear explanation of the issue being solved and a link to the relevant documentation. This makes it easy for other developers to understand why this dependency was added.
Replace
response.bodycalls of Playwright e2e command helpers with response.json(), so the parsed JSON response can be used instead of getting a Buffer object.Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
bigdecimalgem) to address specific method errors in the Ruby on Rails project.Bug Fixes