-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add special chars for Mahan Kosh #41
Comments
It's a style thing. Can you find hand written sarups for reference? |
Hmmmm, I have the Mahan Kosh book. Idk where I can find it handwritten 🫤
…On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 6:48 AM Bhajneet S.K. ***@***.***> wrote:
It's a style thing. Can you find hand written sarups for reference?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#41 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AEFUQD3IMOZOJ52RJOIBL6DXC6TWNANCNFSM6AAAAAAXKM2E3U>
.
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Notes (going down column 1) Even though Devanagari and Gurmukhi both stem from Brahma/Gupta scripts, text rendering engines will not allow gurmukhi vowels on devanagari code points. So can't just style gurmukhi letters on the devanagari unicode points unless they are being used as is (without vowel modification). Others which can fit into Gurmukhi without issue can just be added as is (e.g. half-m and r w/ nukta).
Notes (going down column 2) This seems even harder to integrate into the font. Will have to investigate further.
The most likely approach will be to add ligatures with control chars for Gurmukhi. The same way we use addak bindi for bindi-before-bihari. Or the way we use north-indic fraction chars to vary yayyas. Will have a play around and see what works. Questions / things to confirm or look into:
|
BTW, how are you looking up the number of instances in Mahan Kosh? |
If you search the character in the PDF, it shows the number of results. You can find a PDF of Mahan Kosh with a quick google search. |
Summary
(More of a note for myself).
Description
Reference in Mahan Kosh.
Is that thing under the Kakka corect? This is what it looks like in Sant Lipi:
Approach
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: