-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make do an array #895
Make do an array #895
Conversation
43d0fb2
to
a2d5cd2
Compare
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
ab2e14c
to
ff4fb6e
Compare
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
@matthias-pichler-warrify |
yep, @cdavernas just merged the rename from |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Great work, many thanks! Once we split the task section as pointed by @cdavernas I'll do another round.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
603caed
to
b5c71f1
Compare
Signed-off-by: Matthias Pichler <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks great to me! Many thanks ❤️
Please specify parts of this PR update:
Discussion or Issue link:
Closes #894
What this PR does:
do
,try
,catch.do
,do
infor
,before
andafter
an array of named tasksAdditional information:
Now the usage of
do
both infor
Tasks as well as sequential composite tasks lead to the result thatfor
tasks now also matched the schema of the composite sequential task. As discussed earlier this is because additional/unevaluated properties were not restricted. This lead to the error that afor
task was also recognized as ado
task and hence matched two schemas inoneOf
... I therefore refactored the schema to distinguish between these and no allow additional properties