Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

nixfmt test #23

Open
wants to merge 28 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

nixfmt test #23

wants to merge 28 commits into from

Conversation

kirelagin
Copy link

Motivation for this change
Things done
  • Tested using sandboxing (nix.useSandbox on NixOS, or option sandbox in nix.conf on non-NixOS)
  • Built on platform(s)
    • NixOS
    • macOS
    • other Linux distributions
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all pkgs that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nix-review --run "nix-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • Determined the impact on package closure size (by running nix path-info -S before and after)
  • Ensured that relevant documentation is up to date
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.
Notify maintainers

cc @

yorickvP and others added 28 commits October 10, 2019 12:44
The module has already changed significantly anyways.
It would be weird for it to e.g. allocate a user named foo just because
one uses foo as the attribute name.
@kirelagin
Copy link
Author

Yo @nixfmt

@kirelagin
Copy link
Author

Yoyoyo @nixfmt

@Haskell-mouse
Copy link

@nixfmt

1 similar comment
@mkaito
Copy link

mkaito commented Oct 26, 2019

@nixfmt

@PhilTaken PhilTaken force-pushed the master branch 3 times, most recently from 0c9ef26 to 1dfdbb6 Compare February 2, 2023 09:51
@karandit karandit force-pushed the master branch 2 times, most recently from 0f42a54 to bc91979 Compare December 5, 2023 11:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants