Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
* Make RelayStrategy::final_decision() sync

Signed-off-by: Serban Iorga <[email protected]>

* Move logic from RelayStrategy to RelayReference

Signed-off-by: Serban Iorga <[email protected]>

* Rename RelayStrategy::final_decision()

Signed-off-by: Serban Iorga <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
serban300 committed Apr 9, 2024
1 parent 238653a commit f636f56
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 5 changed files with 116 additions and 102 deletions.
22 changes: 15 additions & 7 deletions bridges/relays/messages/src/relay_strategy/altruistic_strategy.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ use crate::{
message_lane_loop::{
SourceClient as MessageLaneSourceClient, TargetClient as MessageLaneTargetClient,
},
relay_strategy::{RationalStrategy, RelayReference, RelayStrategy},
relay_strategy::{RelayReference, RelayStrategy},
};

/// The relayer doesn't care about rewards.
Expand All @@ -40,13 +40,20 @@ impl RelayStrategy for AltruisticStrategy {
&mut self,
reference: &mut RelayReference<P, SourceClient, TargetClient>,
) -> bool {
// we don't care about costs and rewards, but we want to report unprofitable transactions
// => let rational strategy fill required fields
let _ = RationalStrategy.decide(reference).await;
// We don't care about costs and rewards, but we want to report unprofitable transactions.
if let Err(e) = reference.update_cost_and_reward().await {
log::debug!(
target: "bridge",
"Failed to update transaction cost and reward: {:?}. \
The `unprofitable_delivery_transactions` metric will be inaccurate",
e,
);
}

true
}

async fn final_decision<
fn on_final_decision<
P: MessageLane,
SourceClient: MessageLaneSourceClient<P>,
TargetClient: MessageLaneTargetClient<P>,
Expand All @@ -55,10 +62,11 @@ impl RelayStrategy for AltruisticStrategy {
reference: &RelayReference<P, SourceClient, TargetClient>,
) {
if let Some(ref metrics) = reference.metrics {
if reference.total_cost > reference.total_reward {
if !reference.is_profitable() {
log::debug!(
target: "bridge",
"The relayer has submitted unprofitable {} -> {} message delivery trabsaction with {} messages: total cost = {:?}, total reward = {:?}",
"The relayer has submitted unprofitable {} -> {} message delivery transaction \
with {} messages: total cost = {:?}, total reward = {:?}",
P::SOURCE_NAME,
P::TARGET_NAME,
reference.index + 1,
Expand Down
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ impl<Strategy: RelayStrategy> EnforcementStrategy<Strategy> {

let selected_max_nonce =
hard_selected_begin_nonce + hard_selected_count as MessageNonce - 1;
self.strategy.final_decision(&relay_reference).await;
self.strategy.on_final_decision(&relay_reference);
Some(selected_max_nonce)
} else {
None
Expand Down
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions bridges/relays/messages/src/relay_strategy/mix_strategy.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ impl RelayStrategy for MixStrategy {
}
}

async fn final_decision<
fn on_final_decision<
P: MessageLane,
SourceClient: MessageLaneSourceClient<P>,
TargetClient: MessageLaneTargetClient<P>,
Expand All @@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ impl RelayStrategy for MixStrategy {
reference: &RelayReference<P, SourceClient, TargetClient>,
) {
match self.relayer_mode {
RelayerMode::Altruistic => AltruisticStrategy.final_decision(reference).await,
RelayerMode::Rational => RationalStrategy.final_decision(reference).await,
RelayerMode::Altruistic => AltruisticStrategy.on_final_decision(reference),
RelayerMode::Rational => RationalStrategy.on_final_decision(reference),
}
}
}
90 changes: 89 additions & 1 deletion bridges/relays/messages/src/relay_strategy/mod.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@

use async_trait::async_trait;
use bp_messages::{MessageNonce, Weight};
use sp_arithmetic::traits::Saturating;
use std::ops::Range;

use crate::{
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -56,7 +57,7 @@ pub trait RelayStrategy: 'static + Clone + Send + Sync {
) -> bool;

/// Notification that the following maximal nonce has been selected for the delivery.
async fn final_decision<
fn on_final_decision<
P: MessageLane,
SourceClient: MessageLaneSourceClient<P>,
TargetClient: MessageLaneTargetClient<P>,
Expand All @@ -66,6 +67,14 @@ pub trait RelayStrategy: 'static + Clone + Send + Sync {
);
}

/// Total cost of mesage delivery and confirmation.
struct MessagesDeliveryCost<SourceChainBalance> {
/// Cost of message delivery transaction.
pub delivery_transaction_cost: SourceChainBalance,
/// Cost of confirmation delivery transaction.
pub confirmation_transaction_cost: SourceChainBalance,
}

/// Reference data for participating in relay
pub struct RelayReference<
P: MessageLane,
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -107,6 +116,85 @@ pub struct RelayReference<
pub details: MessageDetails<P::SourceChainBalance>,
}

impl<
P: MessageLane,
SourceClient: MessageLaneSourceClient<P>,
TargetClient: MessageLaneTargetClient<P>,
> RelayReference<P, SourceClient, TargetClient>
{
/// Returns whether the current `RelayReference` is profitable.
pub fn is_profitable(&self) -> bool {
self.total_reward >= self.total_cost
}

async fn estimate_messages_delivery_cost(
&self,
) -> Result<MessagesDeliveryCost<P::SourceChainBalance>, TargetClient::Error> {
// technically, multiple confirmations will be delivered in a single transaction,
// meaning less loses for relayer. But here we don't know the final relayer yet, so
// we're adding a separate transaction for every message. Normally, this cost is covered
// by the message sender. Probably reconsider this?
let confirmation_transaction_cost =
self.lane_source_client.estimate_confirmation_transaction().await;

let delivery_transaction_cost = self
.lane_target_client
.estimate_delivery_transaction_in_source_tokens(
self.hard_selected_begin_nonce..=
(self.hard_selected_begin_nonce + self.index as MessageNonce),
self.selected_prepaid_nonces,
self.selected_unpaid_weight,
self.selected_size as u32,
)
.await?;

Ok(MessagesDeliveryCost { confirmation_transaction_cost, delivery_transaction_cost })
}

async fn update_cost_and_reward(&mut self) -> Result<(), TargetClient::Error> {
let prev_is_profitable = self.is_profitable();
let prev_total_cost = self.total_cost;
let prev_total_reward = self.total_reward;

let MessagesDeliveryCost { confirmation_transaction_cost, delivery_transaction_cost } =
self.estimate_messages_delivery_cost().await?;
self.total_confirmations_cost =
self.total_confirmations_cost.saturating_add(confirmation_transaction_cost);
self.total_reward = self.total_reward.saturating_add(self.details.reward);
self.total_cost = self.total_confirmations_cost.saturating_add(delivery_transaction_cost);

if prev_is_profitable && !self.is_profitable() {
// if it is the first message that makes reward less than cost, let's log it
log::debug!(
target: "bridge",
"Message with nonce {} (reward = {:?}) changes total cost {:?}->{:?} and makes it larger than \
total reward {:?}->{:?}",
self.nonce,
self.details.reward,
prev_total_cost,
self.total_cost,
prev_total_reward,
self.total_reward,
);
} else if !prev_is_profitable && self.is_profitable() {
// if this message makes batch profitable again, let's log it
log::debug!(
target: "bridge",
"Message with nonce {} (reward = {:?}) changes total cost {:?}->{:?} and makes it less than or \
equal to the total reward {:?}->{:?} (again)",
self.nonce,
self.details.reward,
prev_total_cost,
self.total_cost,
prev_total_reward,
self.total_reward,
);
}

Ok(())
}
}

/// Relay reference data
pub struct RelayMessagesBatchReference<
P: MessageLane,
Expand Down
98 changes: 8 additions & 90 deletions bridges/relays/messages/src/relay_strategy/rational_strategy.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -17,9 +17,6 @@
//! Rational relay strategy

use async_trait::async_trait;
use num_traits::SaturatingAdd;

use bp_messages::MessageNonce;

use crate::{
message_lane::MessageLane,
Expand All @@ -44,60 +41,18 @@ impl RelayStrategy for RationalStrategy {
&mut self,
reference: &mut RelayReference<P, SourceClient, TargetClient>,
) -> bool {
let total_cost = match estimate_messages_delivery_cost(reference).await {
Ok(total_cost) => total_cost,
Err(err) => {
log::debug!(
target: "bridge",
"Failed to estimate delivery transaction cost: {:?}. No nonces selected for delivery",
err,
);

return false
},
};

// if it is the first message that makes reward less than cost, let's log it
// if this message makes batch profitable again, let's log it
let MessagesDeliveryCost { confirmation_transaction_cost, delivery_transaction_cost } =
total_cost;
let is_total_reward_less_than_cost = reference.total_reward < reference.total_cost;
let prev_total_cost = reference.total_cost;
let prev_total_reward = reference.total_reward;
reference.total_confirmations_cost = reference
.total_confirmations_cost
.saturating_add(&confirmation_transaction_cost);
reference.total_reward = reference.total_reward.saturating_add(&reference.details.reward);
reference.total_cost =
reference.total_confirmations_cost.saturating_add(&delivery_transaction_cost);
if !is_total_reward_less_than_cost && reference.total_reward < reference.total_cost {
if let Err(e) = reference.update_cost_and_reward().await {
log::debug!(
target: "bridge",
"Message with nonce {} (reward = {:?}) changes total cost {:?}->{:?} and makes it larger than \
total reward {:?}->{:?}",
reference.nonce,
reference.details.reward,
prev_total_cost,
reference.total_cost,
prev_total_reward,
reference.total_reward,
);
} else if is_total_reward_less_than_cost && reference.total_reward >= reference.total_cost {
log::debug!(
target: "bridge",
"Message with nonce {} (reward = {:?}) changes total cost {:?}->{:?} and makes it less than or \
equal to the total reward {:?}->{:?} (again)",
reference.nonce,
reference.details.reward,
prev_total_cost,
reference.total_cost,
prev_total_reward,
reference.total_reward,
"Failed to update transaction cost and reward: {:?}. No nonces selected for delivery",
e,
);

return false
}

// Rational relayer never want to lose his funds
if reference.total_reward >= reference.total_cost {
// Rational relayer never wants to lose his funds.
if reference.is_profitable() {
reference.selected_reward = reference.total_reward;
reference.selected_cost = reference.total_cost;
return true
Expand All @@ -106,7 +61,7 @@ impl RelayStrategy for RationalStrategy {
false
}

async fn final_decision<
fn on_final_decision<
P: MessageLane,
SourceClient: MessageLaneSourceClient<P>,
TargetClient: MessageLaneTargetClient<P>,
Expand All @@ -118,40 +73,3 @@ impl RelayStrategy for RationalStrategy {
// anything here
}
}

/// Total cost of mesage delivery and confirmation.
struct MessagesDeliveryCost<SourceChainBalance> {
/// Cost of message delivery transaction.
pub delivery_transaction_cost: SourceChainBalance,
/// Cost of confirmation delivery transaction.
pub confirmation_transaction_cost: SourceChainBalance,
}

/// Returns cost of message delivery and confirmation delivery transactions
async fn estimate_messages_delivery_cost<
P: MessageLane,
SourceClient: MessageLaneSourceClient<P>,
TargetClient: MessageLaneTargetClient<P>,
>(
reference: &RelayReference<P, SourceClient, TargetClient>,
) -> Result<MessagesDeliveryCost<P::SourceChainBalance>, TargetClient::Error> {
// technically, multiple confirmations will be delivered in a single transaction,
// meaning less loses for relayer. But here we don't know the final relayer yet, so
// we're adding a separate transaction for every message. Normally, this cost is covered
// by the message sender. Probably reconsider this?
let confirmation_transaction_cost =
reference.lane_source_client.estimate_confirmation_transaction().await;

let delivery_transaction_cost = reference
.lane_target_client
.estimate_delivery_transaction_in_source_tokens(
reference.hard_selected_begin_nonce..=
(reference.hard_selected_begin_nonce + reference.index as MessageNonce),
reference.selected_prepaid_nonces,
reference.selected_unpaid_weight,
reference.selected_size as u32,
)
.await?;

Ok(MessagesDeliveryCost { confirmation_transaction_cost, delivery_transaction_cost })
}

0 comments on commit f636f56

Please sign in to comment.