feat: memory storage #220
Merged
feat: memory storage #220
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
BREAKING CHANGE: storage instances now must be passed into the Umzug constructor. strings are no longer supported.
papb
requested changes
May 6, 2020
papb
reviewed
May 7, 2020
papb
requested changes
May 7, 2020
Co-authored-by: Pedro Augusto de Paula Barbosa <[email protected]>
papb
approved these changes
May 7, 2020
|
Nice catch on changing |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
BREAKING CHANGE: storage instances now must be passed into the Umzug constructor. strings (
'json','sequelize','mongodb'etc.), as well asstorageOptions, are no longer supported.This also changes folder structure slightly:
before:
after:
And all built-in storages are exported from the package's
mainmodule, so they can be imported with (e.g.)import { JSONStorage } from 'umzug'