-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 220
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Usn reason timestamp #2231
Usn reason timestamp #2231
Conversation
avoiding lost of already extracted entries.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @patrickdalla!
I think there are failing tests in UsnJrnlParserTest, could you update them?
sure |
Hi @patrickdalla, thanks for the Unit test fixes. Could you implement the ParserConfig.xml config files merging idea? So we would be able to turn records extraction on in forensic and pedo profiles without duplicating ParserConfig.xml into them. |
Yes. I will.
Em seg., 27 de mai. de 2024, 08:09, Luis Filipe Nassif <
***@***.***> escreveu:
… Hi @patrickdalla <https://github.com/patrickdalla>, thanks for the Unit
test fixes.
Could you implement the ParserConfig.xml config files merging idea? So we
would be able to turn records extraction on in forensic and pedo profiles
without duplicating ParserConfig.xml into them.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2231 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AG247S4R6YHIHCU3X35M7X3ZEMO55AVCNFSM6AAAAABIH7HBC6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDCMZTGM2DKMZTGM>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
There is already the ParsersConfig class in iped.engine.config package, it may be used for that. |
Hi @lfcnassif . I have created the merging code for ParserConfig.xml from profile. It replaces completely all the parser tag with the same class attribute from default config with the configured in profile. As it was implemented, only changes and additions can be done (no removal). It works in master and can be merged, but maybe I have to make some changes to avoid conflict in UI config, in which branch i will start working now. There, as the the user can use the UI to select which Parsers to use (including removing some), I replace completely the ParserConfig. So, I will make some distinctions to inform if the config is to be merged ou replaced completely. Maybe a simple attribute in parsers tag. But I will change it in UI config branch, right? |
I remembered that the additional profiles created through UI config are saved in binary form. So, maybe, no conflicts will exists. But I will test it. |
Thanks @patrickdalla! Parser removal while merging multiple ParserConfig.xml files is not needed for this feature, it is fine. When it is needed, I think a new |
@patrickdalla, I think you enabled a wrong parser in forensic and pedo profiles. It should be |
Sorry. It is correct now. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks @patrickdalla! I did minor changes and updated the properties prefix to a shorter one.
Closes #1503 .