Kernel values should be independent of scalar moment

[sstaehler]

Just adding this issue to be able to document the results.

[sstaehler]

It is not at that moment (left: Kernel with scalar moment 1e20, right: 1e25)

[sstaehler]

Fixed by commit ef37ea9

Was a general bug in load_seismogram_rdbm, which uses several false analogies between kerner and rdbm

Problem is that the amplitudes are even larger now, so even further away from Dahlen kernels. But anyway, that's the problem of issue #23

[tnissen]

Always blaming others. ;-)

So again, could the 7 orders of magnitude still not be a unit
definition? Are we sure Dahlen kernels are in SI? It's suspiciously
close to those 10^7 from dyn-cm to N-m even if scalar moments factor
out... maybe it's within the elastic parameters?

On 18/03/2015 21:08, Simon Stähler wrote:

Fixed by commit ef37ea9
ef37ea9

Was a general bug in load_seismogram_rdbm, which uses several false
analogies between kerner and rdbm
comparison_new
https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/5054072/6718267/d485c4de-cdb2-11e4-8cf7-3810918cc148.png

Problem is that the amplitudes are even larger now, so even further
away from Dahlen kernels. But anyway, that's the problem of issue #23
#23

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#24 (comment).

Tarje

<>--<>--<>--<>--<>--<>
Dept. of Earth Sciences
Oxford University
South Parks Road
Oxford OX1 3AN; UK
tel: +44 1865 282149
fax: +44 1865 272072
web: seis.earth.ox.ac.uk http://seis.earth.ox.ac.uk
<>--<>--<>--<>--<>--<>