Add display,name,symbol to tokenfactory denom creation

[philipsu522]

Describe your changes and provide context

x/bank requires that display, name and symbol for all denoms are valid. However, when exporting genesis we found that this is not the case.
This is an initial PoC. We need to backport (migrate all existing denoms) if this looks good.

Testing performed to validate your change

• Unit test
• Created denom locally, ran validate-genesis, ensure it passes
• Created denom on 3.0.3, ran upgrade, ensure new genesis is valid

      "denom_metadata": [
        {
          "base": "factory/sei1099gwedy7ds2ysc8xjegfl9720qmczgfwdzdk7/test",
          "denom_units": [
            {
              "aliases": [],
              "denom": "factory/sei1099gwedy7ds2ysc8xjegfl9720qmczgfwdzdk7/test",
              "exponent": 0
            }
          ],
          "description": "",
          "display": "factory/sei1099gwedy7ds2ysc8xjegfl9720qmczgfwdzdk7/test",
          "name": "factory/sei1099gwedy7ds2ysc8xjegfl9720qmczgfwdzdk7/test",
          "symbol": "factory/sei1099gwedy7ds2ysc8xjegfl9720qmczgfwdzdk7/test"
        },

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #861 (db2076a) into master (b897550) will increase coverage by 0.08%.
The diff coverage is 46.15%.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #861      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   63.53%   63.61%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         250      250              
  Lines       15507    15533      +26     
==========================================
+ Hits         9852     9882      +30     
+ Misses       5187     5184       -3     
+ Partials      468      467       -1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
x/tokenfactory/keeper/migrations.go	65.00% <36.36%> (-35.00%)	⬇️
x/tokenfactory/keeper/createdenom.go	84.78% <100.00%> (+1.44%)	⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

[yzang2019]

Can you add an integration test for this? Instruction are here: https://github.com/sei-protocol/sei-chain/tree/master/integration_test

[yzang2019]

Nice

[yzang2019]

@philipsu522 We also need to add the new integration test to workflow so that CI can pick it up

[yzang2019]

This command is not PARAMS right?