Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SECURESIGN-55 | Monitoring of Sigstore containers with Cockpit #112

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 15, 2025

Conversation

JasonPowr
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@JasonPowr JasonPowr requested a review from a team as a code owner December 2, 2024 12:17
@JasonPowr JasonPowr marked this pull request as draft December 2, 2024 12:18
@JasonPowr JasonPowr force-pushed the enable-monitoring-with-cockpit branch 2 times, most recently from 64d0422 to 7f53c05 Compare December 2, 2024 12:31
@JasonPowr
Copy link
Contributor Author

@bkabrda When you get a chance can you take a look at this?, To me, it didn't make sense to add 'redhat.rhel_system_roles' as a dependency since cockpit is optional wdyt?, and please correct me if I am wrong

@JasonPowr JasonPowr force-pushed the enable-monitoring-with-cockpit branch from 6506bf6 to 949be35 Compare December 2, 2024 14:14
@JasonPowr JasonPowr marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2024 15:12
@JasonPowr JasonPowr requested a review from ritz303 as a code owner December 2, 2024 15:12
@JasonPowr JasonPowr marked this pull request as draft December 4, 2024 14:34
@JasonPowr JasonPowr force-pushed the enable-monitoring-with-cockpit branch 3 times, most recently from 5463656 to a1412f4 Compare December 6, 2024 09:46
@JasonPowr JasonPowr marked this pull request as ready for review December 9, 2024 10:04
Copy link
Collaborator

@bkabrda bkabrda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi Jason, nice job! I provided some inline comments to address. I think it's good to not depend on the rhel system role if we don't require it by default. However, I think in this case the README should list a minimum version of that collection that we guarantee will work.

README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
README.md Outdated
sudo usermod -aG wheel cockpit-user
```

Note: You may need to log out and then log back in to the Cockpit interface for these changes to take effect.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's nice to have these commands, but how about we provide them as a set of tasks that are run optionally, so that user can just set a variable to true and get this set up by the role?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure ofc, never even thought of doing that but now that you mention that makes sense :)

@JasonPowr JasonPowr force-pushed the enable-monitoring-with-cockpit branch 2 times, most recently from 9f4c976 to 3ae3b66 Compare December 13, 2024 10:50
@JasonPowr JasonPowr requested a review from bkabrda January 6, 2025 08:44
@JasonPowr JasonPowr force-pushed the enable-monitoring-with-cockpit branch from 3ae3b66 to aec7e52 Compare January 8, 2025 09:07
@JasonPowr JasonPowr force-pushed the enable-monitoring-with-cockpit branch from e290588 to 4b7907e Compare January 14, 2025 11:18
@JasonPowr JasonPowr requested a review from bkabrda January 14, 2025 12:24
Copy link
Collaborator

@bkabrda bkabrda left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM now, thanks for putting all the work in!

@JasonPowr JasonPowr merged commit 17226bf into main Jan 15, 2025
6 checks passed
@JasonPowr JasonPowr deleted the enable-monitoring-with-cockpit branch January 15, 2025 13:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants