Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reconst scripts part4 #936

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Mar 7, 2024
Merged

Conversation

EmmaRenauld
Copy link
Contributor

Quick description

Checked the final scripts in our reconst column. Didn't find anything to take out of mains: no new function. Only more comments, fixing prints, etc.

...

Type of change

Check the relevant options.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Provide data, screenshots, command line to test (if relevant)

...

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project (run autopep8)
  • I added relevant citations to scripts, modules and functions docstrings and descriptions
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I moved all functions from the script file (except the argparser and main) to scilpy modules
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

@pep8speaks
Copy link

pep8speaks commented Mar 7, 2024

Hello @EmmaRenauld, Thank you for updating !

There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻

Comment last updated at 2024-03-07 18:22:39 UTC

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 90.00000% with 6 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 69.52%. Comparing base (4491228) to head (91e5856).
Report is 15 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #936      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   69.46%   69.52%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         390      392       +2     
  Lines       20944    20970      +26     
  Branches     3205     3207       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        14548    14579      +31     
+ Misses       5093     5090       -3     
+ Partials     1303     1301       -2     
Components Coverage Δ
Scripts 71.96% <88.88%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
Library 65.51% <100.00%> (+0.09%) ⬆️

Copy link
Contributor

@karanphil karanphil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Few renaming and it's GTG!

scripts/scil_NODDI_priors.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
scripts/scil_NODDI_priors.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
scripts/scil_NODDI_priors.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
scripts/scil_sh_convert.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Copy link
Contributor

@arnaudbore arnaudbore left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

GTG

@arnaudbore arnaudbore merged commit 9eeb469 into scilus:master Mar 7, 2024
2 checks passed
@EmmaRenauld EmmaRenauld deleted the reconst_scripts_part4 branch March 8, 2024 12:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants