Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moving OP out of the default output files from scil_btensor_metrics.py. #836

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Dec 8, 2023

Conversation

karanphil
Copy link
Contributor

Following issue #831 from @mdesco, I removed the order parameter (OP) from the default output metrics. You now need to explicitly tell the OP output file path with --op, if not, it will not be computed. You get a parser error if the FA is not also given (with --fa), since it is needed to compute the OP.

@pep8speaks
Copy link

pep8speaks commented Dec 6, 2023

Hello @karanphil, Thank you for updating !

There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻

Comment last updated at 2023-12-06 21:25:26 UTC

@arnaudbore arnaudbore self-requested a review December 6, 2023 20:14
@arnaudbore
Copy link
Contributor

@arnaudbore
Copy link
Contributor

Build passed ! Good Job 🍻 !

@arnaudbore
Copy link
Contributor

@arnaudbore
Copy link
Contributor

Build passed ! Good Job 🍻 !

mean diffusivity (MD), isotropic mean kurtosis (mk_i), anisotropic mean
kurtosis (mk_a), total mean kurtosis (mk_t) and finally micro-FA (uFA).
Specific names can be specified using the
file flags specified in the "File flags" section.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe add a sentence about OP + FA here even you repeat yourself slightly...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't want people to think it has a link with the File flags and --not_all. That is why I talk about it after at line 23. Is it ok?

@arnaudbore arnaudbore merged commit c015690 into scilus:master Dec 8, 2023
5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants