-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BF for asymmetric peaks #1077
BF for asymmetric peaks #1077
Conversation
Hello @CHrlS98, Thank you for updating ! There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻 Comment last updated at 2024-12-16 18:28:02 UTC |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good to me! I learned this *,
trick today.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1077 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 69.46% 69.45% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 447 447
Lines 24052 24053 +1
Branches 3291 3291
==========================================
- Hits 16708 16707 -1
- Misses 5946 5947 +1
- Partials 1398 1399 +1
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
GTG
Quick description
Closes #1072 . The argument
opacity
was missing. Also made keywords mandatory for optional arguments. I don't have data to test every use case, but what I could test does work.Type of change
Check the relevant options.
Provide data, screenshots, command line to test (if relevant)
Checklist