Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BF for asymmetric peaks #1077

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024
Merged

BF for asymmetric peaks #1077

merged 5 commits into from
Dec 17, 2024

Conversation

CHrlS98
Copy link
Contributor

@CHrlS98 CHrlS98 commented Dec 12, 2024

Quick description

Closes #1072 . The argument opacity was missing. Also made keywords mandatory for optional arguments. I don't have data to test every use case, but what I could test does work.

Type of change

Check the relevant options.

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update

Provide data, screenshots, command line to test (if relevant)

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project (run autopep8)
  • I added relevant citations to scripts, modules and functions docstrings and descriptions
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I moved all functions from the script file (except the argparser and main) to scilpy modules
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes

@pep8speaks
Copy link

pep8speaks commented Dec 12, 2024

Hello @CHrlS98, Thank you for updating !

There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! 🍻

Comment last updated at 2024-12-16 18:28:02 UTC

Copy link
Contributor

@karanphil karanphil left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! I learned this *, trick today.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 85.71429% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 69.45%. Comparing base (660d7c9) to head (cb5fd80).
Report is 50 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1077      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   69.46%   69.45%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         447      447              
  Lines       24052    24053       +1     
  Branches     3291     3291              
==========================================
- Hits        16708    16707       -1     
- Misses       5946     5947       +1     
- Partials     1398     1399       +1     
Components Coverage Δ
Scripts 70.25% <100.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
Library 68.39% <83.33%> (ø)

Copy link
Contributor

@arnaudbore arnaudbore left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

GTG

@arnaudbore arnaudbore added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 12, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Dec 12, 2024
@arnaudbore arnaudbore enabled auto-merge December 16, 2024 15:53
@arnaudbore arnaudbore added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 16, 2024
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to failed status checks Dec 16, 2024
@arnaudbore arnaudbore added this pull request to the merge queue Dec 17, 2024
Merged via the queue into scilus:master with commit 86675da Dec 17, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

scil_viz_fodf.py can't visulize peaks.
4 participants