-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix regression: inline match crash when rhs uses private inlined methods #18595
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | ||
import scala.deriving.Mirror | ||
|
||
trait NamedCodec[A, R] | ||
|
||
object NamedCodecPlatform { | ||
|
||
final class Builder[R]() { | ||
inline def of[T](using m: Mirror.Of[T]): NamedCodec[T, R] = | ||
inline m match { | ||
case s: Mirror.SumOf[T] => sumInst(s) | ||
case _: Mirror.ProductOf[T] => productInst | ||
} | ||
|
||
private inline def productInst[T]: NamedCodec[T, R] = ??? | ||
private inline def sumInst[T](m: Mirror.SumOf[T]): NamedCodec[T, R] = ??? | ||
} | ||
} |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ | ||
enum Data { | ||
case A, B, C | ||
} | ||
|
||
@main def Test = { | ||
val builder: NamedCodecPlatform.Builder[Any] = ??? | ||
builder.of[Data] | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is there a reason for these special flags? maybe a comment would help
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, basically
"-Ycheck-all"
option causes this test to fail. But this isn't a regression caused by #18557 it seems to had been this way before. It would be nice to fix it though.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What's the failure?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Some positions in the tree are missing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Fair enough. Looks like it's the TypeTree in the cast in
which is unpositioned. /cc @nicolasstucki
I agree you should just find a way to ignore that. I've not seen
.without("-Ycheck:all")
being used before, but I'm ok with it.