rpm:packageBin reports "rpmVendor in Rpm is empty" despite a value being set

[leifwickland]

Beginning with 1.2.0-M5, attempting to rpm:packageBin always fails with the error:

`rpmVendor in Rpm` is empty

even if a value is set.

Example project to reproduce the problem:
https://github.com/leifwickland/native-bug

[muuki88]

Hi @leifwickland

Thanks for this well done bug report. The error you get is expected. There is a section in the release notes for this release.

All settings prefixed with rpm were moved out of the Rpm scope. This means that you should
remove the in Rpm configuration scope for settings and tasks prefixed with rpm.

This should fix your build.

[leifwickland]

Thanks for explaining, Nepomuk!

…

On Feb 19, 2017 7:04 AM, "Nepomuk Seiler" ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @leifwickland <https://github.com/leifwickland> Thanks for this well done bug report. The error you get is expected. There is a section in the release notes <https://github.com/sbt/sbt-native-packager/releases/tag/v1.2.0-M5> for this release. All settings prefixed with rpm were moved out of the Rpm scope. This means that you should remove the in Rpm configuration scope for settings and tasks prefixed with rpm. This should fix your build. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#943 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAsp5hQlBXOKPrnosY0Jk72QAnm0ZOcEks5reEv6gaJpZM4MDqYP> .

[LeifW]

Is this error message going to get update to remove the in Rpm part?

[muuki88]

IIRC the error message comes from rpm itself. However we plan a validation task in #1026 that will help you figure out the configuration.