Use command line git diff --name-only base..head for diff strategy

[cwbusacker]

Resolves: #52

[saurav0705]

Resolves: #52 I have not been able to test this. How have you been doing your testing?

@cwbusacker
I have another repo where I am running the checks you can do the same just mention the feature branch inside the git action instead of the version
example: saurav0705/check-history-action@more-than-300-files
for now, you can just test the function i will check the workflow

[cwbusacker]

Wont I need the dist check to run first? Looks like the dist check waits for approval before running

[cwbusacker]

Wont I need the dist check to run first? Looks like the dist check waits for approval before running

Nevermind. I read over that workflow and ran it manually locally.

[cwbusacker]

This is working.

[saurav0705]

make the fetch change else it looks good

[cwbusacker]

make the fetch change else it looks good

Did that. Didn't think that was necessary since the check-out step just happened....

But appears your suggested changes had compilation errors, so had to fix that.

[saurav0705]

make the fetch change else it looks good

Did that. Didn't think that was necessary since the check-out step just happened....

But appears your suggested changes had compilation errors, so had to fix that.

@cwbusacker
yeah but that hold true only if it's deep clone if a person is doing shallow clone or cloning with a depth then we might run into this issue