Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

JG.4/DV.7.1 recombinant(4 seqs) and XCT: its further recombinant with XBB.1.9.2 #811

Closed
xz-keg opened this issue Sep 14, 2023 · 65 comments
Closed
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor

xz-keg commented Sep 14, 2023

I find a EG.5.1.3/DV.7.1 recombinant that usher registers with too many reversions and may be dropped out.

image

EG.5.1.3--DV.7.1
Breakpoint: Between 18584 and 19325

Extra mutations: C1684T,C7051T,C20320T,T24073C

Orf1b:H2285Y

https://cov-spectrum.org/explore/World/AllSamples/Past6M/variants?nucMutations=C24134A%2CC7051T%2CC1889T&nextcladePangoLineage1=EG.5.1.3*&nextcladePangoLineage2=DV.7.1*&analysisMode=CompareEquals&

C1684T,C7051T from an EG.5.1.3-branch.

C20320T,T24073C are private

Some DV.7.1 branches have C20320T however they have additional mutations after that so not possible.

Query: C24134A,C7051T,C1889T

The branch include 2 recombs:

(this one with additional C29546T, private, no DV.7.1 has this)
EG.5.1.3--DV.7.1
For EPI_ISL_18254485(France), C24134A,C7051T,C1889T,C29546T

(this one with additional A27507C, T28297C, G27915T(Orf9b:I5T, Orf8:G8*), indicating 2nd breakpoint between 26276 and 27506
EG.5.1.3--DV.7.1--XBB.1.9.2? (Not EG.5.1.3 for not having C29625T)
3-seq branch: C24134A,C7051T,C1889T,A27507C (USA, Switzerland)

So EG.5.1.3 recombs with DV.7.1 and get recomb 1, while recomb 1 recombs with another XBB.1.9.2 and gets recomb 2?

If that's 1 seq I'll view it as artefact, however now we have 4 seqs from 3 countries.

EG.5.1.3-side donor:
image

Current usher

usher
image

@AngieHinrichs
Copy link

Added to list, should be added when 2023-09-14 build is done, thanks.

@FedeGueli FedeGueli added recombinant Singlet One only sample. FLip = S:L455F / S:F456L labels Sep 14, 2023
@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title EG.5.1/DV.7.1 recombinant that may be dropped out by usher EG.5.1/DV.7.1 recombinant that may be dropped out by usher (2 seqs, 2 countries) Sep 26, 2023
@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Sep 26, 2023

@AngieHinrichs

There is a second seq near this . EPI_ISL_18284092 It is a sandwich recombinant of EG.5.1--DV.7.1--EG.5.1, also being removed by usher.

@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title EG.5.1/DV.7.1 recombinant that may be dropped out by usher (2 seqs, 2 countries) 2 EG.5.1/DV.7.1 recombinants that may be dropped out by usher Sep 26, 2023
@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Sep 26, 2023

usher
image

@AngieHinrichs
Copy link

Thanks @aviczhl2, I added EPI_ISL_18284092 to the list so it should be added in the 2023-09-28 build, sorry about the delay. EPI_ISL_18254485 is being added to the tree daily, but then removed by our filter of max 20 private mutations on a singleton sequence. When EPI_ISL_18284092 is added, then EPI_ISL_18254485 will no longer be a singleton with all those mutations and the two sequences should be retained in the 2023-09-28 tree.

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Sep 28, 2023

@AngieHinrichs A 3rd one appears, EPI_ISL_18316684, seems to be the same sandwich recomb of EPI_ISL_18284092.

image

@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title 2 EG.5.1/DV.7.1 recombinants that may be dropped out by usher 3 EG.5.1/DV.7.1 recombinants that may be dropped out by usher Sep 28, 2023
@AngieHinrichs
Copy link

AngieHinrichs commented Sep 29, 2023

OK, added, should be in the 2023-09-29 build. I don't see EPI_ISL_18284092 in the 2023-09-28 build (on dev.usher.bio) as expected; I will try to figure out what happened there.[Edit: I was looking at the wrong tree, never mind, USA/NY-GBW-H10-017-9117/2023|EPI_ISL_18284092|2023-09-07 and France/GES-IPP17866/2023|EPI_ISL_18254485|2023-08-28 are in the 2023-09-28 tree.]

@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title 3 EG.5.1/DV.7.1 recombinants that may be dropped out by usher EG.5.1/DV.7.1 recombinants that may be dropped out by usher(4 seqs, 3 countries) Sep 30, 2023
@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Sep 30, 2023

@AngieHinrichs There's one more from Switzerland. EPI_ISL_18327700

usher

image

@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title EG.5.1/DV.7.1 recombinants that may be dropped out by usher(4 seqs, 3 countries) 2 EG.5.1/DV.7.1 recombinants that may be dropped out by usher(3 seqs and 1 seq) Sep 30, 2023
@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title 2 EG.5.1/DV.7.1 recombinants that may be dropped out by usher(3 seqs and 1 seq) 2 EG.5.1/DV.7.1(/XBB.1.9.2?) recombinants that may be dropped out by usher(3 seqs and 1 seq) Sep 30, 2023
@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Sep 30, 2023

@FedeGueli @ryhisner @NkRMnZr @krosa1910 @HynnSpylor please help me on this. Seems extremely complex.

@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title 2 EG.5.1/DV.7.1(/XBB.1.9.2?) recombinants that may be dropped out by usher(3 seqs and 1 seq) EG.5.1.3/DV.7.1 recombinant and its further recombinant with XBB.1.9.2 that may be dropped out by usher(1 seqs and 3 seq) Sep 30, 2023
@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title EG.5.1.3/DV.7.1 recombinant and its further recombinant with XBB.1.9.2 that may be dropped out by usher(1 seqs and 3 seq) EG.5.1.3/DV.7.1 recombinant and its further recombinant with XBB.1.9.2 that may be dropped out by usher(1 seq and 3 seqs) Sep 30, 2023
@FedeGueli
Copy link

@FedeGueli @ryhisner @NkRMnZr @krosa1910 @HynnSpylor please help me on this. Seems extremely complex.

For sure inwill look at it tomorrow

@AngieHinrichs
Copy link

Added, thanks.

@FedeGueli
Copy link

It is looks like a XCM-alike sandwich recombinant between EG.5.1.3/DV.7.1 ( and the french sample could be a further recombination or a recombinant itself parent of this recombinant)

to me it could be (please check):
from Eg.5.1.3:
C1889T,C2334T,G5720A,C9693T,C12789T,T16342C,A16878T,A18492G,A27507C,G27915T,T28297C

from DV.7.1: A19886G,A20741G,T22016C,C22033A,A22115G,A22190G,T22200G,G22331A,A22893C,T22917G,G22927T,T22928C,C24134A,T24991A,G25606A,C25721T,T25959C
and C20320T sublineage of DV.7.1 (10 seqs)
Schermata 2023-10-01 alle 11 35 55

Private mutations:
C44T,C835T,C1684T,C7051T ,T24073C

So it would be

1-18429 EG.5.13
18430-19885 Breakpoint 1
19886-25959: DV.7.1
25960-27506 : Breakpoint 2
27507- 3' end: EG.5.1.3

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Oct 1, 2023

So it would be

1-18429 EG.5.13 18430-19885 Breakpoint 1 19886-25959: DV.7.1 25960-27506 : Breakpoint 2 27507- 3' end: EG.5.1.3

Thanks for the analysis. As said this is a complex recomb so there're some problems need fixing.

How about 29625 missing? This one doesn't have C29625T however EG.5.1.3 has.

Also that DV.7.1 branch of C20320T has additional C27849A which is not present in the French seq (where 19886-3' are all DV.7.1)

@FedeGueli
Copy link

FedeGueli commented Oct 1, 2023

27849

yeah it could be also this one as donor: https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome-test.gi.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice1_genome_test_3e515_96edd0.json?c=userOrOld&label=id:node_10941447 (link edited)

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Oct 1, 2023

27849

yeah it could be also this one as donor: https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome-test.gi.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice1_genome_test_3e515_96edd0.json?c=userOrOld&label=id:node_10941447 (link edited)

But it also doesn't have 28695?

@FedeGueli
Copy link

FedeGueli commented Oct 1, 2023

Yeah about the orf10 mutation likely the donor was already itself a recombinant within XBB.1.9 family.

@FedeGueli
Copy link

FedeGueli commented Oct 1, 2023

27849

yeah it could be also this one as donor: https://nextstrain.org/fetch/genome-test.gi.ucsc.edu/trash/ct/subtreeAuspice1_genome_test_3e515_96edd0.json?c=userOrOld&label=id:node_10941447 (link edited)

But it also doesn't have 28695?

it is dv.7.1 : i mean DV.7.1 side donor

@FedeGueli
Copy link

So concluding:
it could be a EG.5.1.3 with a dv.7.1/xbb.1.9 recombinant
or a "EG.5.1.3/XBB.1.9 recombinant"sandwich recombinant with DV.7.1

@JosetteSchoenma
Copy link

XCT

@FedeGueli FedeGueli added designated and removed To be proposed Green light for proposal labels Oct 15, 2023
@FedeGueli FedeGueli added this to the XCT milestone Oct 15, 2023
@FedeGueli
Copy link

Designated XCT

@FedeGueli FedeGueli added XCT and removed Rapid review needed Singlet One only sample. labels Oct 15, 2023
@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title EG.5.1.3/DV.7.1 recombinant and its further recombinant with XBB.1.9.2 that may be dropped out by usher(2 seq and 16 seqs ) XCT: EG.5.1.3/DV.7.1 recombinant and its further recombinant with XBB.1.9.2 that may be dropped out by usher(2 seq and 16 seqs ) Oct 16, 2023
@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Oct 16, 2023

It seems that currently the parental recomb (without G8*, C27507A and T28297C) is designated as XCT?

https://nextstrain.org/staging/nextclade/sars-cov-2

image

@FedeGueli
Copy link

It seems that currently the parental recomb (without G8*, C27507A and T28297C) is designated as XCT?

https://nextstrain.org/staging/nextclade/sars-cov-2

image

only that one? does the designation misses the real XCT? in the other case it catches all i would not make a difference cc @corneliusroemer what do you think?

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Oct 16, 2023

only that one? does the designation misses the real XCT? in the other case it catches all i would not make a difference cc @corneliusroemer what do you think?

I'm not sure, but the 2 recombs shall not be under one name. Either give both a designation, this may create a recomb with only 2 seqs but helpful for explanation. Or remove seqs of the parental recomb from XCT and to clarify the children recomb is XCT.

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Oct 17, 2023

@AngieHinrichs new XCT(children recomb) seqs,

EPI_ISL_18395595, EPI_ISL_18392290, EPI_ISL_18391834, EPI_ISL_18381777,EPI_ISL_18391799

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Oct 19, 2023

@AngieHinrichs 7 more today, all children recomb

EPI_ISL_18403312, EPI_ISL_18403342, EPI_ISL_18403373-18403374,
EPI_ISL_18405163, EPI_ISL_18406342, EPI_ISL_18406427,

@JosetteSchoenma
Copy link

JosetteSchoenma commented Oct 20, 2023

2 more from NSW. EPI_ISL_18411444 and EPI_ISL_18411775
The query catches 33 samples now!

@AngieHinrichs
Copy link

Thanks @aviczhl2 and @JosetteSchoenma, I added those IDs to my file. In the future would it be too much trouble for you to add sequences to https://github.com/sars-cov-2-variants/lineage-proposals/blob/main/recombinants.tsv ?

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Oct 21, 2023

Thanks @aviczhl2 and @JosetteSchoenma, I added those IDs to my file. In the future would it be too much trouble for you to add sequences to https://github.com/sars-cov-2-variants/lineage-proposals/blob/main/recombinants.tsv ?

That's for undesignated lineages.

Will it cause conflict for designated lineages as they may also appear elsewhere with different labels?

recombinants.tsv also has a function for manual search of currently proposed recombs I think it shouldn't be too big (keep it <1000
seqs). Designated lineages may grow to very large and if there's too many seqs inside we cannot manual search.

What's your suggestion?

@AngieHinrichs
Copy link

OK, I misunderstood the purpose of recombinants.tsv, thanks for clarifying that.

Perhaps there could be a separate file just for IDs of sequences that should be exempted from the too-many-reversions filter? Like #991, but just a file of IDs.

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Oct 23, 2023

OK, I misunderstood the purpose of recombinants.tsv, thanks for clarifying that.

Perhaps there could be a separate file just for IDs of sequences that should be exempted from the too-many-reversions filter? Like #991, but just a file of IDs.

Maybe I shall create one to include those seqs as well as XCT before they are not removed by usher.

BTW: Is XCM still being filtered out? When can usher automatically recognize a lineage and stop removing its seqs?

@AngieHinrichs
Copy link

Maybe I shall create one to include those seqs as well as XCT before they are not removed by usher.

That would be extremely helpful!

BTW: Is XCM still being filtered out?

Most XCM should not be filtered out as far as I can tell. The 2023-10-23 tree has 72 sequences placed in XCM even though my local file that exempts sequences from too-many-reversion filtering has only 7 IDs (none in recombinants.tsv). They are right on the edge of filtering, with 5 reversions relative to placement in the nextclade tree version 2023-09-21T12:00:00Z. Any sequence with one or more extra reversions could be filtered.

When can usher automatically recognize a lineage and stop removing its seqs?

When these things happen:

  1. There is a nextclade sars-cov-2 data release
  2. I re-run nextclade with the latest data on all sequences

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Oct 25, 2023

  1. There is a nextclade sars-cov-2 data release
  2. I re-run nextclade with the latest data on all sequences

By nextclade data release, do you mean https://nextstrain.org/staging/nextclade/sars-cov-2 ?

I see XCT is already there?

@AngieHinrichs
Copy link

I believe https://nextstrain.org/staging/nextclade/sars-cov-2 is Cornelius's nightly build -- it's pre-release. By release I mean official releases like https://github.com/nextstrain/nextclade_data/releases/ . When there is a new release, I can download the new release data files and then re-run nextclade on all sequences.

My nightly build runs the latest downloaded release on all new sequences, which doesn't take much time -- but re-running nextclade every night on all pre-existing sequences would take a lot more time.

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Oct 25, 2023

I believe https://nextstrain.org/staging/nextclade/sars-cov-2 is Cornelius's nightly build -- it's pre-release. By release I mean official releases like https://github.com/nextstrain/nextclade_data/releases/ . When there is a new release, I can download the new release data files and then re-run nextclade on all sequences.

My nightly build runs the latest downloaded release on all new sequences, which doesn't take much time -- but re-running nextclade every night on all pre-existing sequences would take a lot more time.

I see. So whatsoever designated lineages will be included eventually when nextclade performs a formal release every month?

@AngieHinrichs
Copy link

I see. So whatsoever designated lineages will be included eventually when nextclade performs a formal release every month?

Yes.

@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Nov 12, 2023

1 more for the parental recomb. EPI_ISL_18494770

@xz-keg xz-keg changed the title XCT: EG.5.1.3/DV.7.1 recombinant and its further recombinant with XBB.1.9.2 that may be dropped out by usher(2 seq and 16 seqs ) JG.4/DV.7.1 recombinant(4 seqs) and XCT: its further recombinant with XBB.1.9.2 Nov 19, 2023
@xz-keg
Copy link
Contributor Author

xz-keg commented Nov 19, 2023

1 more for the parental recomb EPI_ISL_18518466

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants