Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update rubocop-rspec 3.0.1 → 3.0.2 (patch) #1353

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

depfu[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@depfu depfu bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Here is everything you need to know about this update. Please take a good look at what changed and the test results before merging this pull request.

What changed?

✳️ rubocop-rspec (3.0.1 → 3.0.2) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

3.0.2

  • Fix wrong autocorrect for RSpec/ScatteredSetup when hook contains heredoc. (@earlopain)
  • Fix false negative for RSpec/PredicateMatcher when expectation contains custom failure message. (@earlopain)
  • Facilitate the 3.0 upgrade flow with proper extracted cop messages. (@jeppester)

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 17 commits:

↗️ rexml (indirect, 3.3.0 → 3.3.1) · Repo · Changelog

Release Notes

3.3.1

Improvements

  • Added support for detecting malformed top-level comments.

    • GH-145
    • Patch by Hiroya Fujinami.
  • Improved REXML::Element#attribute performance.

    • GH-146
    • Patch by Hiroya Fujinami.
  • Added support for detecting malformed <!--> comments.

    • GH-147
    • Patch by Hiroya Fujinami.
  • Added support for detecting unclosed DOCTYPE.

    • GH-152
    • Patch by Hiroya Fujinami.
  • Added changlog_uri metadata to gemspec.

  • Improved parse performance.

Fixes

  • Fixed a bug that large XML can't be parsed.

  • Fixed a bug that private constants are visible.

Thanks

  • Hiroya Fujinami

  • NAITOH Jun

  • fynsta

Does any of this look wrong? Please let us know.

Commits

See the full diff on Github. The new version differs by 13 commits:


Depfu Status

Depfu will automatically keep this PR conflict-free, as long as you don't add any commits to this branch yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting with @depfu rebase.

All Depfu comment commands
@​depfu rebase
Rebases against your default branch and redoes this update
@​depfu recreate
Recreates this PR, overwriting any edits that you've made to it
@​depfu merge
Merges this PR once your tests are passing and conflicts are resolved
@​depfu cancel merge
Cancels automatic merging of this PR
@​depfu close
Closes this PR and deletes the branch
@​depfu reopen
Restores the branch and reopens this PR (if it's closed)
@​depfu pause
Ignores all future updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu pause [minor|major]
Ignores all future minor/major updates for this dependency and closes this PR
@​depfu resume
Future versions of this dependency will create PRs again (leaves this PR as is)

@depfu depfu bot added depfu Technical Debt Technical Debt labels Jul 4, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.87%. Comparing base (1463e33) to head (6742bcd).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #1353   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    97.87%   97.87%           
========================================
  Files          393      393           
  Lines        12248    12248           
========================================
  Hits         11988    11988           
  Misses         260      260           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor Author

depfu bot commented Jul 13, 2024

Closed in favor of #1359.

@depfu depfu bot closed this Jul 13, 2024
@depfu depfu bot deleted the depfu/update/rubocop-rspec-3.0.2 branch July 13, 2024 19:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants