Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Snap through example #91

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024
Merged

Snap through example #91

merged 4 commits into from
Oct 17, 2024

Conversation

ralberd
Copy link
Contributor

@ralberd ralberd commented Oct 16, 2024

Adds snap-through unit cell example using traction control

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 76.40%. Comparing base (6782079) to head (e56dca8).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #91   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   76.40%   76.40%           
=======================================
  Files          61       61           
  Lines        5051     5051           
=======================================
  Hits         3859     3859           
  Misses       1192     1192           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@cmhamel cmhamel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me.

Just FYI for Brandon and Mike... Ryan ran into some breaking changes with the latest version of jax so I suggested he freeze it to 0.4.28. I ran into similar issues with another jax code.

@ralberd ralberd merged commit 87d421b into main Oct 17, 2024
4 checks passed
@ralberd ralberd deleted the ralberd/add_snap_example branch October 17, 2024 17:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants