array: remove S.pluck

[davidchambers]

I don't see a compelling reason to provide a shorthand for map + prop but not for map + get. I also don't find the shorthand clearer:

S.map (S.prop ('foo'))

S.pluck ('foo')

The problem with the shorthand is that I forget which of the two possible combinations it is short for. ;)

[Avaq]

I never use pluck.

[Avaq]

I don't see a compelling reason to provide a shorthand for map + prop but not for map + get.

Wait.. what? There are either one too many negatives in this sentence, or a "but" where there should be an "and".

[davidchambers]

I think what I wrote makes sense, Aldwin. I was trying to state that I don't see a reason to do A but not B. In other words, if we do A we should also do B. The implication is that in this case doing both A and B is silly, so we should not do either.

Too much negation, though, I agree. :)

[Avaq]

Ahh. I was reading:

I don't see a compelling reason to (provide a shorthand for map + prop) (but not for map + get).

But you meant:

I don't see a compelling reason to provide a shorthand for (map + prop) (but not for map + get).

I read it so many times over and missed that. Okay. All clear now! ;)

[davidchambers]

This (is (why)) (I (am)) (so) (fond) (of (parentheses)). ;)

[miwillhite]

I used map(prop('foo')) the other day thinking that Sanctuary wouldn't have pluck (it seems a bit contrary to the simplistic nature of Sanctuary)…then was surprised when I scrolled past it later. I didn't update my code…so I think 👍 from me too ;)

[stefano-b2c2]

Ha. You've had it in for this function from pretty much day one, David.