Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(website): migrate from webpack to rspack #1248

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 30, 2024

Conversation

ryoppippi
Copy link
Contributor

I modified the preapare script in website to use rspack instead of webpack.
I tested in my local environment, and it runs really fast and works perfectly

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Aug 28, 2024

New and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher

🚮 Removed packages: npm/[email protected]), npm/[email protected]), npm/[email protected]), npm/[email protected]), npm/[email protected]), npm/[email protected]), npm/[email protected])

View full report↗︎

@ryoppippi ryoppippi marked this pull request as draft August 28, 2024 23:12
Copy link
Owner

@samchon samchon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for configuration.

@samchon samchon marked this pull request as ready for review August 30, 2024 08:19
@samchon samchon merged commit b9793f8 into samchon:master Aug 30, 2024
2 checks passed
@ryoppippi ryoppippi deleted the feature/webpack-to-rspack branch August 30, 2024 08:19
@ryoppippi
Copy link
Contributor Author

ryoppippi commented Aug 30, 2024

Wait I'm still working on this PR because I haven't modified the options yet.(that is why this is a draft PR!)
could you revert it?
@samchon

@ryoppippi
Copy link
Contributor Author

If it works, that is fine.I'll create a new PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants