Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: fix help output #172

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

chore: fix help output #172

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

WillieRuemmele
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Adds back long description help for commands

What issues does this PR fix or reference?

@W-9735653@

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
{
"description": "convert source into Metadata API format",
"description": "convert source into Metadata API format \n Converts source-formatted files into metadata that you can deploy using Metadata API. \nTo convert source-formatted files into the metadata format, so that you can deploy them using Metadata API,\nrun \"sfdx force:source:convert\". Then deploy the metadata using \"sfdx force:mdapi:deploy\".\n\nTo convert Metadata API–formatted files into the source format, run \"sfdx force:mdapi:convert\".\n\nTo specify a package name that includes spaces, enclose the name in single quotes.",
Copy link
Contributor

@jshackell-sfdc jshackell-sfdc Aug 10, 2021

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changed my mind, ignore the previous suggestion (which I also removed :) )

Copy link
Contributor

@jshackell-sfdc jshackell-sfdc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@WillieRuemmele , I have one small suggestion. I also added missing content for force:source:open, which wasn't on your original list of changed files. It's hard for me to imagine what this will look like by just looking at file diffs, but I'm gonna assume it's okay.

Copy link
Contributor

@jshackell-sfdc jshackell-sfdc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry for the confusion :)

@WillieRuemmele
Copy link
Contributor Author

closed in favor of #174 for some reason NUTs didn't like this branch

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants