Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement the center of a universal enveloping algebra in the PBW basis #37013

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Mar 25, 2024

Conversation

tscrim
Copy link
Collaborator

@tscrim tscrim commented Jan 5, 2024

We provide an implementation of the center of the universal enveloping algebra in the PBW basis of a finite dimensional Lie algebra with basis.

We provide a few other fixes along the way:

  • Add an option to return all Casimir elements, not just the first obtained (in particular, see type $D_{2n}$).
  • Add some latex output options for some Lie algebras.
  • Improving compatibility with the plural g-algebras.

📝 Checklist

  • The title is concise, informative, and self-explanatory.
  • The description explains in detail what this PR is about.
  • I have linked a relevant issue or discussion.
  • I have created tests covering the changes.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

⌛ Dependencies

@tscrim tscrim force-pushed the lie_algebras/enveloping_center branch from c76198b to 90b5502 Compare March 18, 2024 17:10
Copy link

Documentation preview for this PR (built with commit 025b921; changes) is ready! 🎉

Copy link
Contributor

@fchapoton fchapoton left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok, let's go

@vbraun vbraun merged commit 1ce7939 into sagemath:develop Mar 25, 2024
16 checks passed
@mkoeppe mkoeppe added this to the sage-10.4 milestone Mar 25, 2024
@tscrim tscrim deleted the lie_algebras/enveloping_center branch March 28, 2024 11:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants