Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix bug with Set equality/inequality #35197

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 26, 2023
Merged

Conversation

jhpalmieri
Copy link
Member

Description

Fixes Set inequality (issue #35178)

Changes

Details at #35178

  • I have made sure that the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR.
  • I have linked an issue or discussion.
  • I have created tests covering the changes.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

⌛ Dependencies

(none)

@github-actions
Copy link

Documentation preview for this PR is ready! 🎉
Built with commit: 421bb59

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Base: 88.60% // Head: 88.58% // Decreases project coverage by -0.02% ⚠️

Coverage data is based on head (421bb59) compared to base (8f5bbd2).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop   #35197      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    88.60%   88.58%   -0.02%     
===========================================
  Files         2140     2140              
  Lines       397273   397274       +1     
===========================================
- Hits        352004   351936      -68     
- Misses       45269    45338      +69     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/sage/sets/set.py 93.25% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️
...e/combinat/cluster_algebra_quiver/mutation_type.py 49.88% <0.00%> (-3.09%) ⬇️
src/sage/combinat/combination.py 93.50% <0.00%> (-1.50%) ⬇️
src/sage/cpython/_py2_random.py 75.20% <0.00%> (-1.24%) ⬇️
src/sage/coding/channel.py 97.10% <0.00%> (-0.73%) ⬇️
src/sage/modular/modform/numerical.py 94.19% <0.00%> (-0.65%) ⬇️
src/sage/sets/integer_range.py 91.41% <0.00%> (-0.51%) ⬇️
src/sage/graphs/tutte_polynomial.py 93.57% <0.00%> (-0.46%) ⬇️
src/sage/graphs/generic_graph.py 89.14% <0.00%> (-0.44%) ⬇️
src/sage/schemes/elliptic_curves/cardinality.py 87.40% <0.00%> (-0.40%) ⬇️
... and 16 more

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

Copy link
Contributor

@mkoeppe mkoeppe left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@vbraun vbraun merged commit 2540fe8 into sagemath:develop Mar 26, 2023
@mkoeppe mkoeppe added this to the sage-10.0 milestone Mar 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants