-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 48
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: add slither job #714
ci: add slither job #714
Conversation
chore: fix solc remap path in slither config
@andreivladbrg I've updated the GitHub action, as it was failing due to attempting to call Context: |
It looks like the slither job keeps on failing, I had a look and I couldn't figure it out why. @scorpion9979 can you help us? |
@andreivladbrg It seems like the GitHub action is still attempting to call Update: It was another failed attempt. I'll experiment more and run the workflow in my personal repo. I'll get back to you once I think it's ready, so please feel free to ignore any workflow approval requests for now. |
revert: ci: use cached build for slither job
thank you 🙏🏻 |
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
@scorpion9979 It looks like the slither job has passed.Am I missing something? |
…red when a compilation framework is used
@andreivladbrg Thanks! I just re-ran all CI jobs after setting up the GitHub secrets in my forked repo and all are now passing. I just double-checked to make sure the Slither job is as clean as possible, and I think this PR is now ready to be reviewed and merged. |
The fork tests have failed again. I've seen on your fork that they worked, and I also tested them locally and they worked. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
Good job @scorpion9979
Thanks again for your contribution, @scorpion9979! @andreivladbrg did you look over the Slither report to check whether it reported something that we should address? |
Yeah, I did and found nothing that we should address. You can see the report here. |
Great.
Could you please mark all items in the code scan report as "False positive", "Used in tests", or "Won't fix"? |
* ci: add slither job chore: fix solc remap path in slither config * ci: use cached build for slither job * ci: use solc 0.8.21 in slither job * ci: revise slither job revert: ci: use cached build for slither job * ci: remove superfluous "solc-version" config in slither job not required when a compilation framework is used --------- Co-authored-by: andreivladbrg <[email protected]>
Addresses #418.
Recreated from #431.